IT is a mystery that has captivated people around the world since it slithered into the public imagination in the 1930s. But scientists carrying out a groundbreaking study may just have pinpointed the true nature of the Loch Ness monster.
Having combed the loch for samples of environmental DNA, researchers believe the most plausible explanation for Nessie: a giant eel.
The research, led by professor Neil Gemmell from the University of Otago in New Zealand, involved 250 water samples taken from the edges, centre and very depths of Britain’s largest body of fresh water by volume.
The DNA from each sample was isolated and sequenced and then compared to global DNA databases in a bid to create a comprehensive picture of life in the loch.
The findings quickly debunked one of the most popular theories: that the Loch Ness monster could be a reptile, or population of reptiles, which survived from the time of the dinosaurs, such as a plesiosaur.
Other theories suggest Nessie may be a giant catfish, a giant sturgeon, an eel or even a Greenland shark, which can live for up to 500 years.
The only possibility not ruled out by the research was that of a giant eel – perhaps explaining Nessie’s looped shape in the popular imagination.
Gemmell said: “There is a very significant amount of eel DNA. Eels are very plentiful in Loch Ness, with eel DNA found at pretty much every location sampled – there are a lot of them.
“So, are they giant eels? Well, our data doesn’t reveal their size, but the sheer quantity of the material says we can’t discount the possibility that there may be giant eels in Loch Ness.”
He added: “Divers have claimed they’ve seen eels that are as thick as their legs in the loch, whether they’re exaggerating or not, I don’t know, but there is a possibility that there are very large eels present in the loch.
“Whether they are as big as around 4m (13ft) as some of these sightings suggest – well, as a geneticist I think about mutations and natural variation a lot, and while an eel that big would be well outside the normal range, it seems not impossible that something could grow to such unusual size.”
The professor said that further research was needed to test the theory, but added: “Based on our data, giant eels remain a plausible idea.”
Another finding from the research was the high levels of DNA from land-based species in the loch, including humans, dogs and farm animals such as sheep and cattle. DNA from wild animals such as deer, badgers, foxes, rabbits, voles and multiple bird species was also found and could aid studies of biological diversity.
Adrian Shine, leader of the Loch Ness Project, which collects scientific data in the area, said: “Gemmell’s environmental DNA survey of Loch Ness has furnished us, at a stroke, with species lists, to compare with those we have compiled over the last 40 years with net and microscope.
“This powerful yet elegant technique has also brought a new maturity to the popular debate about what much larger creatures might sometimes be seen here.”
A documentary about the hunt for Nessie’s DNA is due to air on the Discovery Channel on September 15.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel