THE warm late summer weather helped food sales in the UK grow, but these were offset by a fall in non-food sales as shoppers continue to wait and see how Brexit plays out, new data has revealed.
In August, UK retail sales fell 0.5% on a like-for-like basis, compared with the same month last year, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC) and KPMG.
Helen Dickinson, BRC chief executive, said: “Greater economic and political uncertainty has driven down consumer demand. While the summer weather gave a small boost to food sales, this was cancelled out by a drop in non-food sales.
“Summer discounting and poor footfall have hit in-store sales particularly hard. If the UK Government wants to avoid seeing further store closures and job losses on the UK high street, they must take action.”
Over the three months to August, food sales decreased 0.3% on a like-for-like basis and increased 0.5% on a total basis.
But, despite the rise in total sales for food, non-food sales during the period declined 3% on a total and like-for-like basis, helping to drag down the 12-month total average to minus 2.6%.
Susan Barratt, chief executive of the IGD food and drink trade body, suggested the hot bank holiday weekend helped, but any growth from households stockpiling for No-Deal Brexit has not materialised.
She said: “Food and grocery sales moved back into positive territory in August with year-on-year growth, thanks considerably to the approaching Bank Holiday heatwave.
“As August progressed, the October Brexit deadline received increasing attention but only 3% of shoppers say they’ve begun to build stocks for this purpose.”
KPMG head of retail Paul Martin added that the majority of retailers are focused on preservation, rather than growth, due to the political and economic uncertainty.
He added: “Online sales outperformed the high street, but with growth as low as 2.2%, it’s clear that even this channel has slowed down drastically.
“With a budgetary Spending Review, the Brexit crunch point looming and potentially a General Election on the cards, the only thing that is certain in the coming months is further uncertainty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here