AN online petition calling for the Tory government not to suspend Parliament has gathered more than 1.4 million signatures.
The e-petition on Parliament's website gained 100,000 signatures in just a few hours, the threshold it needed for it to be debated by MPs.
Signatures on the petition continue to climb, despite the Queen approving an order on Wednesday afternoon to prorogue Parliament no earlier than September 9 and no later than September 12, until October 14.
Thousands of people protested against the plans to suspend Parliament, with rallies in London, Edinburgh and other cities within hours of Prime Minister Boris Johnson announcing the decision.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson hit by resignations amid Parliament shutdown backlash
Critics, including Commons Speaker John Bercow, called the move a "constitutional outrage", designed to stop MPs from intervening as the UK heads towards a no-deal Brexit on October 31.
But the protests were dismissed as "phoney" by Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg.
He said the move was not intended to limit the time available for MPs to debate Brexit, but will allow the Government to tackle other issues.
"I think the outrage is phoney and it is created by people who don't want us to leave the European Union and are trying very hard to overturn the referendum result and don't want the benefits of leaving the European Union."
He added: "Parliament wasn't going to be sitting for most of this time anyway. This is completely constitutional and proper."
READ MORE: MPs launch legal bid to reverse Parliament shutdown
With more than one million signatures, the e-petition is now one of Parliament's top five most-signed proposals.
In March, a petition entitled "Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU" gathered more than six million signatures, becoming the best-supported proposal in the history of the House of Commons and Government's e-petitions website.
The now-closed petition was rejected by the Government, in a response explaining that revoking Article 50 would "undermine" democracy.
In its official response to the petition, the Department for Exiting the EU said: "Revoking Article 50, and thereby remaining in the European Union, would undermine both our democracy and the trust that millions of voters have placed in Government.
"The Government acknowledges the considerable number of people who have signed this petition. However, close to three-quarters of the electorate took part in the 2016 referendum, trusting that the result would be respected."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel