BUS drivers in Glasgow are to be balloted for industrial action in a dispute over public safety.
Unite announced on Thursday that drivers with First Glasgow will be consulted on whether to take action, including strikes.
The union claims service changes proposed by the group, which it believes will start in October, will result in “significant cuts” in running times and recovery times for drivers. It said the introduction of the changes, without any consultation, will be a “direct threat” to public safety in a “drive to further increase profits”.
It was also suggested that by cutting running times, there will also be a reduction in the number of buses available to the public.
However, First Bus has said they are in the “consultation phase of proposed network changes” which aim to bring improvements. Trade union comment will be sought on these and safety is the company’s top priority.
The consultative ballot by the union will take place in September.
Mick Dowds, Unite’s national convener, said: “Unite members are furious that at a time when public safety is paramount and after Unite welcomed the Speed Awareness Agreement alongside supporting other health and safety initiatives such as Destressing the Driver, First Glasgow is blatantly scurrying around with a new set of rosters.
“This will directly impact on drivers’ well-being and could have a catastrophic effect on passengers and the public. First Group announced some time ago that it intended to sell its passenger operations, including its flagship First Glasgow company.
“This latest development highlights exactly why Unite has been calling on local authorities such as Glasgow to bring passenger services back into public and municipal ownership.
“This is essential to ensure services meet the needs of communities and those most vulnerable in society rather than having diminished services in the chase for profit.”
Andrew Jarvis, managing director of First Bus in Scotland, said he is “disappointed” with the union’s decision and that it has gone public with its concerns “given we are at an early stage in the process”.
He added: “I can confirm that nothing as yet has been registered with the Traffic Commissioner’s office and we are still very much in the consultation phase of the proposed network changes that Unite have raised concerns over.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel