AN independent Scotland’s budget deficit should not “necessarily” pose a barrier to the country rejoining the European Union, according to a senior economist.
David Phillips, associate director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, told The National the decision to allow the country to join the bloc would be a political rather than an economic one.
He made the point after the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) report, published yesterday, revealed the deficit is 7% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP).
The European Union’s Excessive Deficit Procedure rules state: “EU countries must demonstrate sound public finances and meet two criteria: their budget deficit must not exceed 3% of gross domestic product (GDP); public debt (government debt and that of public agencies) must not exceed 60% of GDP.”
Referring to Scotland’s notional deficit for 2018/19, Phillips said: “EU countries are meant to keep their deficit below 3% and Scotland’s is currently about 7% so there could be issues there.”
But he added: “I’m not sure whether [the deficit] would necessarily be a binding thing as ultimately the decision about whether Scotland could join would be a political one rather than economic.”
Phillips also argued that the EU would take account of whether Scotland had a credible plan to reduce the deficit when it came to assessing whether the EU would agree to an Scotland becoming an independent member.
The economist also considered the possible impact of Scotland becoming an EU member when the UK had left the EU. He said the short term economic situation could be difficult but this could be outweighed by longer-term prosperity.
READ MORE: Fact Check: What the deficit means for Scottish independence and Europe
READ MORE: Fact check: Is Scotland responsible for half of the UK deficit?
“Potentially, the bigger issue about joining the EU is the extent to which ... yes there would be low trade barriers with the EU, but there would be trade barriers with the UK. How that played out could be quite important,” he said.
“In the short term that could make things harder for the economy of Scotland but in the long term it could increase Scotland’s integration with the rest of EU and it could make up for the bigger barriers with the UK by becoming an English language hub with the EU. These are open questions, and probably the more significant ones than the deficit one.”
Phillips underlined that the public finance figures showed Scotland as the most prosperous nation in the UK outside England, with a budget deficit per person around £2300, compared to £4200 per person for Wales and £4700 per person for Northern Ireland and was among the more prosperous parts of the UK.
He said: “Ranking the nations and regions in order of prosperity or GDP, it would be London and the south-east, then east of England and then Scotland. Then you would have south- west, east Midlands and north-west, with Wales and Northern Ireland at the bottom.”
“Scotland is quite unusual in that it is about average in terms of its economy, but it has a much bigger deficit than average and that’s because government spending is quite high, some of it because of high need, some of driven by historically high levels of funding because the way the funding system works ... Scotland has a deficit but it is not because Scotland is poor, it is because public spending is high.”
Phillips added: “These figures do mean that unless growth were to pick up very substantially quite quickly, the Scottish Government would have to engage in a degree of spending restraint ... unless there is a step change ... the Scottish Government would need to take measures to tackle its deficit by either raising taxes or holding down spending growth and that would mean difficult choices.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel