BORIS Johnson’s claim that the backstop undermined the Good Friday Agreement was described as “rank hypocrisy” by Sinn Fein but welcomed by the DUP.

The latter’s leader, Arlene Foster, claimed there was no support among Unionists for the safety net intended to prevent a hard border on the island of Ireland.

In his letter to European Council president Donald Tusk, Johnson said: “The historic compromise in Northern Ireland is based upon a carefully negotiated balance between both traditions in Northern Ireland, grounded in agreement, consent and respect for minority rights.

“While I appreciate the laudable intentions with which the backstop was designed, by removing control of such large areas of the commercial and economic life of Northern Ireland to an external body over which the people of Northern Ireland have no democratic control, this balance risks being undermined.”

Instead, Johnson said, the border could effectively be replaced with a commitment to “alternative arrangements” involving the use of technology.

The National:

READ MORE: Johnson takes UK closer to the brink as EU rejects backstop demand

Tusk, above, disagreed. He tweeted: “The backstop is an insurance to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland unless and until an alternative is found. Those against the backstop and not proposing realistic alternatives, in fact, support re-establishing a border. Even if they do not admit it.”

Sinn Fein’s Stormont leader, Michelle O’Neill said: “It is rank hypocrisy for Boris Johnson to claim to be acting in the interests of the peace process, claiming it will be damaged by the backstop.

“In reality, it is Boris Johnson’s reckless pursuit of a No-Deal Brexit that is threatening to undermine the peace process.

“Brexit is incompatible with the Good Friday Agreement and the Tories have shown a total and callous disregard for that agreement and for the democratically expressed wishes of the people of the north.”

Foster told the BBC: “It is inconsistent with the sovereignty of the United Kingdom, and, of course, it risks weakening the delicate balance, as is pointed out in the letter, between the parties to the Belfast Agreement.

“I think that’s very important because, of course, the Belfast Agreement has been used to justify the backstop but, as the Prime Minister points out, it doesn’t have our support.”

She added: “When you look across unionism, we are all against the backstop so that should concern the Dublin government, because if the Dublin government is genuine and values the Belfast Agreement it should be very concerned that unionism does not support the backstop.”