RECORDS are being reviewed of patients across Scotland who received treatment from a fake psychiatrist who practised for 22 years without a qualification.
Zholia Alemi was jailed for fraud in October last year after she changed an elderly patient’s will to make herself a beneficiary. She denied charges of fraud and theft but was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison following a trial at Carlisle Crown Court.
Her deception across the UK triggered an urgent investigation and checks on the licences of potentially thousands of other doctors.
Alemi claimed she had a primary medical qualification when she first registered in the UK in 1995. But her claim to have a degree from the University of Auckland in New Zealand was fraudulent.
Now clinical records in each NHS Scotland health board are being reviewed in detail by consultant psychiatrists to identify decisions made by Alemi and offer advice and support.
Scotland’s chief medical officer warned earlier this year that Alemi may have referred some for needless electro-convulsive therapy. Health Secretary Jeane Freeman said: “I know that this will be extremely upsetting for people and their families. The General Medical Council (GMC) now has processes in place to ensure that this won’t happen again.
“I also wish to reassure people that the remainder of their care and treatment was delivered by fully qualified doctors. If anyone affected has any further questions, they can get in touch with their local board.”
READ MORE: Warning over jailed bogus psychiatrist's shock therapy referrals
The GMC previously apologised for “inadequate” checks made in the 1990s and for “any risk arising to patients as a result”. It said Alemi joined the medical register in the UK under a section of the Medical Act that has not been in force since 2003.
This legislation allowed graduates of medical schools in certain Commonwealth countries to obtain registration on the basis of their qualification, without having to pass a standard two-part assessment. These documents were not subject to the rigorous checks that exist today.
NHS Scotland boards will write to affected patients over the coming months with more information.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here