AMIDST all the deal or No Deal of Brexit, it was interesting to hear Scottish independence and the prospect of indyref2 hitting the headlines.
But interesting and welcoming as this was, the source makes the prospects quite unlikely! The source being shadow chancellor John McDonnell MP informing voters in Scotland that a future Labour government would not oppose a future independence referendum.
READ MORE: John McDonnell says UK Labour won't block indyref2
Unlikely, because the prospect of a Labour government returning to power dwindles by the day. In making this announcement the shadow chancellor has recognised that support for Scottish independence has reached heights in excess of 50%. But internally for his own party in Scotland, John McDonnell has merely sent Scottish Labour into yet another crisis of identity, setting their sights and efforts on the fall-out of this announcement, taking their eye off the ball of Boris Johnson and his pro-Brexit Cabinet racing towards a No-Deal.
But was it any wonder shadow chancellor John McDonnell raised the profile of indyref2 as Scotland teeters on the cliff-edge of a No-Deal Brexit, a No Deal which will plunge many hard working individuals and families into economic crisis, threaten thousands of jobs and put medical supplies at risk. The Labour Party’s U-turn on indyref2 is very welcome and begs the question, will Scottish Labour support their shadow chancellor's vision for Scotland’s future?
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
IN Andrew Learmonth’s article about Labour at war over indyref2 (Labour at war over indyref2 as McDonnell promises not to block a new referendum, August 7), Labour’s shadow chancellor John McDonnell is quoted as referring to Westminster as “the English parliament itself”.
READ MORE: McDonnell: indyref2 plans will be submitted to 'English parliament'
Revealing language indeed, and clearly indicative of the real underlying attitude of so many Unionist politicians of whichever party.
In reality it has never been anything other than an English parliament serving English interests. Is Scottish Labour finally waking up to this? I have my doubts. Anyway, I look forward to the day when Ian Blackford leads our SNP MPs out of the place for the last time ... and home to an independent Scotland.
Billy Scobie
Alexandria
VERY interesting summation by Kevin McKenna of Scottish Labour’s death throes (Labour is dying slowly in Scotland ... what’s the worst that could happen if they backed independence?, August 7) in which he traced its difficulty to its loss of politicians who had some serious political nous and ability.
READ MORE: Labour is dying in Scotland ... time to consider backing independence
My reading of these events can more easily be summarised by suggesting, latterly – from Scottish Labour’s point of view – its political structure simply became a “gravy train” for Labour activists to follow regardless of their actual ability. It became something akin to “its muggin’s turn”.
But I have little interest in that – my major concern, looking to the future, is its counter weight, namely the leadership from within the SNP.
In the past, all its leaders were – and some still are – people who “cut their teeth” in politics when, campaigning on the doorstep the SNP, irrespective of its message, was a considered a joke.
The real and very serious challenge facing the SNP is to ensure, with the passage of time, it simply does not supplant Scottish Labour and provide that same “gravy train” structure for the “muggins”.
Alan McKinney
Via email
RUTH Davidson is quoted in yesterday’s National apparently expressing empathy for those struggling financially in the face of impending Brexit (Fracture in Davidson’s fragile truce with PM, August 7).
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson's fragile truce with Boris Johnson fractured over Brexit
Her class-consciousness, however, flounders rapidly on the rock of revealed insight.
The millions who live every month on their overdraft are certainly suffering, but where is Ms Davidson’s compassion and concern for those who couldn’t get an overdraft from a bank with a striped jersey, a mask and a gun? What does she propose to do for those dependent on food banks, pay day shysters and loan sharks and the welfare system which her party, with her wholehearted support, has comprehensively trashed?
The reek of hypocrisy clings to her every utterance.
Les Hunter
Lanark
I AM raging for another year. I speak as a retired secondary and primary qualified teacher of many years.
I have taught in various stages, including all areas of special needs, over a period of 20-plus years. The idea that standards can continue to rise is ludicrous. Every year brings different kids to an exam situation, these kids are individuals, not necessarily exam material.
Every child comes from a different background – some where books are common, others not. To expect every teaching establishment to make ground every year is nonsense. We are talking silk purses and sow’s ears here. I and any other educator can only work with those pupils in front of us. The notion that every passing year will bring huge improvement is ridiculous, in 50 years everyone will be a genius!
Let’s look at a more holistic programme, where results are not calculated in A results in Highers, let’s look at where students can pursue their callings, vocational or academic. Let’s actually value where students' strengths are. Not everyone has to go to uni, this was a myth promoted by Blair. It does not hold.
We need gas engineers, plumbers etc, people who make the world go round. My advice to the ever ready critics of this SNP government, shut up and face the front, as was thought in many a classroom in my day. There is no one-size-fits-all in a realistic education service. I have spoken!
Wendy Wilson
Drymen
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here