YESTERDAY’S poll on Scottish independence made for grim reading for Richard Leonard.
A third (34%) of Labour voters told the pollster they will now back for independence, and a majority (53%) of the party’s supporters say Brexit strengthens the case for Scotland to become independent. Just 9% of Labour backers said Brexit strengthened the case for the Union.
When asked to choose between the UK and the EU, Labour’s voters were split on the issue.
Asked – if it were not possible to do both – if it would be more important for Scotland to remain part of the UK, or to remain in the EU, 46% would choose the UK, while 40% would choose the EU.
And Scottish voters as a whole still thought Boris Johnson was a better leader than Jeremy Corbyn, and Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard.
READ MORE: LibDems blame the Tories for independence poll results
Asked which of the two most likely candidates would make the better prime minister, 29% of Scots named Johnson, and just 23% said Corbyn.
Nearly half said they didn’t know. Fewer than four in 10 Labour voters said they thought Corbyn would make the best prime minister.
If forced to choose, Scots voters said they would prefer a Labour government with Corbyn as prime minister to a Johnson-led Conservative government by 57% to 43%.
Incredibly, a quarter of Labour voters said they would prefer the Eton educated toff to remain in charge, rather than hand over the keys to Number 10 to the veteran left-winger.
What will almost certainly terrify the party is the flakiness of their vote.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland under fire over failure to report Ashcroft indy poll
While SNP and Tory voters said they were very likely to make the same choice at the next election, Labour voters put their chance of voting the same way at just 56%.
The SNP, the LibDems and the Greens all held some appeal for the wavering Labour voters.
Responding to the Lord Ashcroft poll, Leonard commented: “Labour is not a party that stands for the status quo in the UK: economically, politically or constitutionally.”
He added:“But the real change we need to see in society is also a shift away from austerity to one of investing in our people, our communities and our public services.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel