JO Swinson has said she would respect the result of another EU referendum – even if the public backed Brexit for a second time.
The new LibDem leader said that although she would not stop campaigning for the UK to be a part of the EU, she would recognise the public’s decision to leave if they were to vote again.
Speaking on Sky News’s Sophy Ridge programme yesterday, Swinson said: “If we had a situation where we had a
People’s Vote on a specific Brexit, then if there were to be a vote in that scenario in favour of a specific Brexit deal, then I would absolutely recognise that that was what the country had decided to do.
READ MORE: Jo Swinson – who is the new Liberal Democrat leader?
“At the moment the difference is, and the difficulty is, that I don’t think there is a majority in this country for any specific type of Brexit.
“Even the Brexiteers can’t agree among themselves – some of them say Theresa May’s deal is not good enough because it’s not ‘Brexity’ enough for them, and others who voted Leave in good conscience, listening to what they were told about how they would be leaving with a deal in an orderly manner, are appalled at the thought we might be crashing out without a deal.
“So there isn’t agreement amongst Brexiteers, therefore I don’t think there is agreement in the country for any specific Brexit proposal and that’s why we need to put this issue back to the people and I will campaign strongly to remain in the EU.”
Swinson also confirmed that she would honour the result of any second referendum on EU membership: “Yes – I wouldn’t stop changing my view about what was right for the country, but, yes, I would absolutely honour that result.”
Asked whether she would campaign for the UK to apply to rejoin the EU in the event of Brexit, the LibDem leader said: “I’m determined to stop Brexit. But in the scenario that we end up outside of the EU, we need to recognise that that’s not the end of Brexit, that’s the beginning of years and years and years of Brexit negotiations and wrangling.
“In that scenario, there’s [sic] going to be decisions, day in, day out, week in, week out, about what our relationship looks like with the EU and I will be campaigning for as close as possible a relationship in those circumstances for regulations to align as much as possible, for us beefing up our diplomatic efforts in EU capitals so that we have strong relationships.
“That is where our best future lies as members of the EU, and if it cannot be, then it has to be as close as possible to the EU for our strategic, geopolitical interests and for people’s jobs in this country.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel