AN SNP MP is celebrating after a hard-fought campaign culminated in the announcement of plans to increase family leave for parents of sick and premature babies.
David Linden, the MP for Glasgow East whose two children were born prematurely, has been battling for more flexible leave for parents whose children and born prematurely, and has criticised the government over a lack of progress.
Now, in one of her final acts as Prime Minister, Theresa May has launched a consultation on increasing leave when babies are premature, as well as equalising leave allowances so that all fathers can take more time off with their children.
Linden said: “For so many of us who have been through the distress of having children born premature or sick, this has been a long and hard-fought campaign.
“When I stood in the hospital last year watching my prematurely born daughter struggling for breath, I knew I had to use my position as an MP to influence change and secure better employment rights for other parents.
“It is vital that this step is meaningfully followed through, and whoever takes over in Downing Street next week must secure and strengthen those rights by introducing legislation and not rolling back.”
The government consultation asks questions about whether statutory paternity leave for fathers and same-sex partners should be changed.
At present, the time granted by the law for parental leave is often superseded by the time spent by a baby in neonatal care. Under current UK legislation, fathers receive a maximum of two weeks paid paternity leave and must use it within the first 56 days after their child is born.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here