POLICE in Hong Kong have fought with protesters as they broke up a demonstration by thousands of people demanding the resignation of the semi-autonomous Chinese territory’s chief executive and an investigation into complaints of police violence.
The protest that began at about 3pm local time in the northern district of Sha Tin was peaceful throughout most of the day.
But some scuffles broke out after nightfall, when police with helmets and shields started clearing streets in the densely crowded area of high-rise buildings.
Hundreds of protesters, many wearing helmets and surgical masks, retreated into a shopping complex, where some threw umbrellas and water bottles at police.
Police followed them, and reporters could see the two sides along walkways of several floors of the complex hitting each other with umbrellas and grabbing each other’s helmets.
The demonstration added to an outpouring of grievances over the past six months against the former British colony’s leaders.
Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997, when it was returned to China under the “one country, two systems” framework.
The system guaranteed the people of Hong Kong rights and freedoms that are largely absent in mainland China.
But now critics complain that leaders are eroding Hong Kong’s freedoms and autonomy and are more responsive to the Beijing government than to the territory’s people.
Protests that began last month in opposition to a proposed extradition law have also swelled to include complaints about an influx of mainland Chinese into Hong Kong.
Yesterday, protesters demanded an investigation into complaints that police assaulted participants in earlier demonstrations against the extradition law.
Some carried signs reading “Police Are Liars”. Other signs read “Defend Hong Kong”.
“There were a lot of large-scale protests and the government has not responded to them,” said one protester, 59-year-old Peggie Cheung.
“The police seem to have become even more violent. I didn’t think this protest would do much to help, but coming out on the streets felt like a responsibility to me.”
The protests reflect mounting complaints that Hong Kong’s leaders are eroding the freedoms and autonomy promised when the territory was returned to China in 1997.
Some protesters carried American or colonial-era Hong Kong flags.
The government of chief executive Carrie Lam suspended action last month on the extradition bill, which would have allowed Hong Kong crime suspects to be transferred to the mainland, where the ruling Communist Party controls the court system.
Last month, one million people took to the streets of Hong Kong to protest the bill. And at the start of July, protesters stormed the parliament to show their disdain for the legislation. They broke glass and spray-painted walls in the building.
Lam apologised for her handling of the legislation, but critics are demanding she resign.
“Carrie Lam has been hiding,” said Nelson Yip, a man in his forties who joined yesterday’s protest.
“She has made many promises, but she has not been able to fulfil them. There is no sign she is going to fulfil them.”
On Saturday, police used clubs and tear gas to break up a crowd of mostly young protesters who called for tighter control on mainland traders who visit Hong Kong.
Critics say they are improperly undercutting Hong Kong businesses.
Earlier yesterday, a group representing Hong Kong journalists marched to Lam’s office on Hong Kong island to highlight complaints that police beat and obstructed reporters at earlier demonstrations.
They handed a letter addressed to the territory’s police commissioner to an officer.
“It seems that they have deliberately targeted the journalists,” said Chris Yeung, chairman of the Hong Kong Journalists Association.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here