HEALTH charities have urged the Scottish Government to press ahead with legislation on gender identification reform to remove barriers to accessing sexual health services for transgender and non-binary people.
In a joint letter, five charities dealing with sexual health and transmission of blood-borne viruses such as HIV and hepatitis C said the recently announced delay in legislative change to the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) means “ongoing harm” to gender-diverse people.
The Scottish Government had planned to change legislation to remove the need for trans people to provide evidence – including medical records – that they have lived in their chosen gender for at least two years.
The Government announced last month reforms would be delayed for a further consultation before a draft Bill is introduced at Holyrood before the end of the year, despite holding a 16-week consultation last year.
More than 15,500 responses were received to the 2018 consultation but less than half were from Scotland. Of those Scottish responses, 65% were in favour of reform.
Waverley Care, Scottish Drugs Forum, Terrence Higgins Trust, HIV Scotland, and LGBT Health and Wellbeing have sent a joint letter to Social Security and Older People Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville, urging no delay to the draft Bill consultation.
The letter states: “While the proposed system is not in place, trans and non-binary people continue to be subjected to intrusive and harmful medical requirements to gain basic recognition of their gender identity.
“We urge the Scottish Government to consider the ongoing harm caused to people who are gender diverse in engaging with the current system.
“Moreover, we are concerned that a second consultation phase invites continued societal discourse on the legitimacy of trans people’s experiences and adds another layer of harm to their health and wellbeing.”
Trans and non-binary people are “disproportionately affected” by poor sexual health, it adds, and worldwide trans women are 49 times more likely to be HIV positive than the general population.
The letter continues: “We know from evidence that people who are marginalised in society face barriers to accessing sexual health services, including fear and stigma.
“The trans people we work with tell us that fear of misgendering and a lack of compassionate support prevents them from accessing basic sexual health services, including contraception and STI prevention.
“GRA reform is a key step in addressing the marginalisation of trans and non-binary communities, by allowing people to more easily gain legal recognition of their gender identity. By reducing the marginalisation trans and non-binary people face, GRA reform would enable better access to sexual health services and assist our organisations’ work to reduce HIV transmissions.”
The charities also urge the Government to “consider the inclusion of people who are non-binary in the development of a system of self-determination”.
Announcing the delay last month, Somerville said the Scottish Government is committed to reforming the GRA, and any new proposals are still likely to remove the need for applicants to provide medical evidence, but “the current requirements will be replaced by an alternative statutory process”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel