This article was brought to you by The Ferret.
THE UK nuclear safety watchdog has boosted checks on two reactors in Scotland because of proliferating cracks in their graphite cores.
The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) has raised its level of regulation for reactors three and four at Hunterston B nuclear power station in North Ayrshire from “routine” to “enhanced” to assess the dangers posed by hundreds of cracks.
READ MORE: Experts slam 'disingenuous' nuclear reactor plan for Scotland
Both reactors were closed down last year while the risks of the cracks leading to a major accident were investigated. Reactor three, the older, was shut on March 9, 2018, and has an estimated 370 cracks – in breach of the ONR’s safety limit of 350.
Reactor four was closed on October 2, 2018, and has an estimated 200 cracks. The reactors’ operator, EDF Energy, is urging ONR to allow each reactor to run with up to 700 cracks.
ONR is expected to make a decision in the next few weeks about reactor four. Critics predict that it will be allowed to reopen for a few months and then shut down again for inspections.
A decision on the future of reactor three looks much further off. EDF only submitted its safety case for restarting the reactor in June, and ONR is likely to need many months to assess it.
EDF has repeatedly postponed its planned restart dates for the two reactors, with number four currently scheduled to come back online on July 22, 2019, and number three on October 1, 2019.
READ MORE: Safety risks exposed by nuclear bomb convoy exercise in Scotland
The reactors started generating electricity in 1976 and can provide up to 20% of Scotland’s electricity. They were originally due to close in 2006, but EDF has said that it wants to keep them both going until at least 2023.
In its latest annual report ONR disclosed that Hunterston B had been “elevated to an enhanced level of regulatory attention”. This was because assessment of the cracks was “intensive” and required “substantial additional effort”, ONR said.
The cracks in the graphite blocks that make up the reactor cores are caused by intense bombardment by radiation over decades. Experts fear blocks could split and trigger an accidental release of radioactivity.
Dr Ian Fairlie, a radiation consultant, and Dr David Toke, reader in energy policy at Aberdeen University, think that both reactors should remain shut. “Scotland doesn’t need electricity from Hunterston B, and the cracks in its reactors increase the risk of a catastrophic accident spreading radioactive contamination over Glasgow and Edinburgh,” they said.
“ONR should not allow either of the reactors three or four to reopen. It’s simply not worth the risk.”
READ MORE: Nuclear has no place in Scotland’s energy mix
The Green MSP Ross Greer welcomed ONR’s enhanced regulation. “Why on earth, with all the safety warnings we have heard, are we still talking about restarting the reactors instead of taking the practical steps on decommissioning and a just transition for the plant workers and for the wider local economy?” he said.
Rita Holmes, chair of Fairlie Community Council near Hunterston, said that her personal opinion was that ONR should not allow reactor three to restart. “Why take the risk when consequences from it being proved wrong could be dire?” she told The Ferret.
ONR said it its safety assessment of reactor four was continuing. “Whilst this assessment work is nearing completion, ONR has yet to reach a decision on whether reactor four can return to service or otherwise,” said an ONR spokesperson.
“ONR will only allow the reactor to return to service if we are satisfied that it is safe to do so. Until we reach such a decision, the reactor will remain shut down. With regards to reactor three, we received the safety case on June 17, 2019. Our assessment of this will start in due course.”
EDF stressed that the numbers of cracks in the reactors hadn’t been counted but “projected” on the basis of predictions that had proved accurate. The company confirmed its latest forecast dates for returning both reactors to service.
“These dates present our most likely view of return to service,” said Hunterston B station director, Colin Weir. “It is not possible for us to confirm with certainty how long this process will take. Our top priority is that it’s completed with appropriate rigour.”
The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at https://theferret.scot/ and can subscribe for £3 a month here: https://theferret.scot/subscribe/
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel