INDEPENDENT monitors should oversee satellite tags on birds of prey to improve “accountability and transparency” after a spate of deaths, gamekeepers say.
The Scottish Gamekeepers Association (SGA) is to launch a petition calling for the introduction of a new monitoring regime to help police prosecute potential wildlife crimes and provide “more transparent” records on the persecution of protected birds.
Tags are placed on species including golden eagles, hen harriers and red kites to track their movements, learn about their behaviours and detect illegal killings.
A total of 50 crimes against birds were recorded in Scotland in 2016-17, which does not include the disappearances of six golden eagles and three hen harriers.
READ MORE: MSP Alison Johnstone bids to end mountain hare and fox ‘slaughter’
The RSPB and other bodies have suggested shooting businesses and large estates could be behind some disappearances, but landowners say they too are involved in the fight against raptor persecution.
Last month it was confirmed that two red kites found dead in Kirkcudbright had been illegally poisoned.
Under the current system, Police Scotland must request data on tagged birds from the tag owners or third parties. However, the SGA says that system has “enabled campaigners to present versions of evidence for publicity, even in instances where police investigators have not been able to establish criminality”.
Alex Hogg, chair of the SGA, said: “Accountability and transparency has to be the objective.
“Despite media accusation and trials, no cases of missing satellite tags have ever had the evidential rigour to go to court. If police had the oversight on the data and the independent expertise to analyse it, there is greater potential for prosecution. Police themselves admitted in parliament recently that establishing criminality in satellite tag cases is difficult.”
READ MORE: Green MSP angers gamekeepers over missing bird of prey
The SGA claims the 2018 case of “Fred the Eagle” proves why a review is needed. The signal from that bird’s tag went dead in the Pentlands in January before resuming in the North Sea days later.
The organisation claims clips posted to YouTube by campaigners show activists with tag information used this to “drip-feed” a narrative and shape public opinion before passing it to police for thorough investigation.
Two online clips on the matter are said to show the same snow patterns on the ground, despite being released weeks apart.
Hogg commented: “If tags were independently monitored, scenarios like this would simply not occur. Evidence would replace speculation.”
Appearing before MSPs in March, Detective Chief Superintendent David McLaren said tag reliability is “improving” but challenges around evidence gathering remain for investigators.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel