THE opening of Sir Richard Branson’s first Virgin Hotel in Britain has been delayed by a year – after archae-ologists at the site in Edinburgh unearthed artefacts dating back 1000 years.
The excavation, at a site in the Cowgate, has lasted more than a year, three times longer than expected, due to the range of objects and material discovered from the 10th century.
Experts say the remains of buildings found predate Edinburgh Castle and the creation of the town burgh by David I by around 200 years.
The work has also unearthed ditches and walls marking the original boundary of the city and some of the discoveries could date as far back as the Bronze Age.
The findings are expected to become a major selling point of a stay at Branson’s first hotel in the UK, which will boast 225 rooms and create more than 300 jobs.
During a 60-week excavation, a human skull, a drinking vessel, shoes, jewellery, and knives, along with a ball used in a giant catapult and an early cannonball were discovered.
Hearths, wall panel, structural timbers, rubbish pits and wells have also been unearthed during the dig by the Virgin team working on it.
The plans for the hotel at the India Buildings on Victoria Street and an adjacent gap site were announced in February of last year, with a 2020 opening date.
But Virgin Hotels said work would finally begin at the site “within weeks,” with the aim of the hotel now opening in 2021.
Edinburgh City Council archaeologist John Lawson said: “This has been one of the most significant urban excavations ever undertaken in Scotland. We have found everything we could have probably hoped to
find on an excavation like this – there was basically 1000 years of archaeology on the site. The full analysis and research has still to be done, but the results of the work have been tremendous, in terms of scale and quality, and the preservation is outstanding.
“For the first time ever, we have found a series of buildings which pre-date the formation of the medieval town in the 12th century.
“There are a great sequence of layers on the site which almost tell the story of Edinburgh in microcosm.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here