HOLDING a future independence referendum should be under the control of the Scottish Parliament, according to the leader of Glasgow City Council.
In a motion lodged at the local authority ahead of a meeting on Thursday, the SNP's Susan Aitken will urge councillors to back her call for Holyrood to have authority over the referendum process.
Aitken will also ask councillors to support her in writing to the Scottish Government's Constitutional Relations Secretary, Michael Russell, in support of principles which include the referendum is held "in line with established best practice".
In her motion, Aitken states: "Council welcomes the publication of the Referendums (Scotland) Bill on May 29 and notes that it is expected to complete its parliamentary progress by the end of 2019.
"Council notes that the Bill provides a legal framework for holding referendums on matters that are now, or in future, within the competence of the Scottish Parliament."
It continues: "Council recognises that, as Scotland is dragged towards the exit door of the EU by a Conservative Government for which we did not vote, and that the promises made by the No Campaign in the 2014 independence referendum lie in tatters, citizens in Glasgow and across Scotland are entitled to exercise their right to reject this future through a further referendum on independence.
"Council agrees that a future independence referendum should be under the control of the Scottish Parliament and, under the guidance of the Electoral Commission, be fair and open, in line with established best practice, and command public confidence, and instructs the Leader of the Council to write to the Cabinet Secretary for Government Business and Constitutional Relations in support of these principles and of the aims of the Referendums (Scotland) Bill."
As well as outlining her support for an independence referendum to be controlled by Holyrood, Aitken also notes Scotland's 62% Remain vote in the EU referendum of 2016 and states concern over Tory leadership candidates who have outlined plans to leave the EU without a deal.
Scotland In Union chief executive Pamela Nash accused Aitken of "constitutional grandstanding".
"This tells you everything you need to know about the SNP's priorities in Glasgow," she said.
"Local residents want councillors to focus on the day job of improving education services, cleaning up the city's streets and delivering elderly care – not constitutional grandstanding.
"The majority of people in Scotland don't want a divisive second independence referendum.
"Remaining in the UK will ensure a bright economic future for Glasgow as a target for major UK investment, rather than putting the local economy at risk by erecting trade barriers."
The group leader of the Glasgow Conservatives, Thomas Kerr, said: "It's time the SNP honoured their pledge that the 2014 referendum was a once in a generation event and stop pursuing constitutional chaos with another referendum just to keep their party together.
"Glasgow needs an administration that will focus its attention on the day job.
"Susan Aitken has shown since 2017 that she's the SNP's voice in the City Chambers, not Glasgow's voice.
"She either needs to get on with the day job she was elected to do or step aside and find a new one.
"People across our city have one clear message for the SNP – no second referendum."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel