Nicola Sturgeon is facing calls from campaigners to introduce a new benefit to tackle child poverty three years earlier than the Scottish Government has planned.
The First Minister has been told "kids can't wait" for the introduction of a new income supplement for families on low earnings, in a letter from poverty campaigners, faith leaders, academics and charities.
An update from the Scottish Government about the income supplement - due to be introduced in 2022 - is expected on Wednesday.
More than 70 organisations and campaign leaders have signed the letter urging the introduction to be brought forward.
The letter warns "child poverty projections for the coming years are stark", with official Government forecasts predicting the child poverty rate will rise to 35% by 2020-21.
It argues the proposed introduction of the supplement to top up families' incomes in 2022 is "simply too far away".
Describing the measure as a "valuable lifeline", the joint letter calls for four key actions from the Scottish Government - passing legislation for the supplement before the next parliamentary election; putting an interim supplement in place ahead of that; announcing funding for the benefit to be announced in next year's budget, and for the policy to "make substantive progress" towards the Government's poverty targets.
Jackie Brock, chief executive of the charity Children in Scotland, said the early implementation of the family income supplement "would make a crucial difference" to the 240,000 children in poverty across the country.
"The level of poverty many families are experiencing in Scotland in 2019 is an affront to our society's shared instincts about fairness, justice and equality," she said.
"It must not be tolerated. Harsh austerity policies pursued by UK Governments over the last nine years have been the major driving force behind this.
"However, the Scottish Government has the power to act now and stop further increases in child poverty.
"It needs to be bolder and more ambitious if it is to meet its own targets laid out in the Child Poverty (Scotland) Act.
"Early implementation of the family income supplement would make a crucial difference to children and families across Scotland, and would demonstrate that what UN rapporteur on extreme poverty Philip Alston has described as the 'principles of dignity and social security as a human right' are alive in Scotland."
Moderator of the Church of Scotland the Right Rev Colin Sinclair said: "In a caring society we need to ensure that everyone is protected.
"The way we look after our children is a key indicator of how well we are putting our values into practice.
"Delivering the income supplement before 2022 would go a long way to put our words into deeds and would make a significant difference for many families today."
Kerrie Friel, an anti-poverty activist and parent of four, said: "Too many families are being swept up in the rising tide of poverty, struggling to pay bills and put food on the table.
"The new Income Supplement will be a lifeline for families desperate to stay afloat, but we need it now. Kids can't wait."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel