A SUMMIT of 28 European Union leaders has failed to reach agreement on who should take on the bloc’s top jobs.
The talks, held in Brussels, continued until the early hours of yesterday morning without candidates being finalised.
On top of trying to find majorities for successors, leaders were also trying to decide what issues the EU should prioritise over the next five years.
A new summit will now be held on June 30 – just two days before a key meeting of the European Parliament.
The most powerful role being decided is EU Commission president, held by ex-Luxembourg PM Jean-Claude Juncker since 2014.
The European Commission drafts EU laws, oversees national budgets, enforces EU treaties and negotiates international trade deals.
“I note with certain amusement that it is not easy to replace me,” Juncker told journalists at a press conference.
Nominees require the support of least 21 of the 28 EU leaders and a majority in the European Parliament – which will meet on July 2.
The choices for the EU’s top jobs have to take account of last month’s European elections and achieve an acceptable balance regarding large and small states, gender and geography. The elections produced more political fragmentation, including a surge in the numbers of Green and liberal MEPs.
The contest for a new commission president began with the parliament’s “Spitzenkandidat” (lead candidate) race, but leaders do not have to go along with the result.
The parliament says the president should come from the party with the most seats – which would mean Manfred Weber, a German in the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP). Potential rivals to Weber are EU veteran Frans Timmermans (Dutch, from the centre-left Socialist bloc) and Danish EU commissioner Margrethe Vestager, a liberal. But French President Emmanuel Macron favours Michel Barnier – who has been in charge of negotiating Brexit – for the post.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here