TALKS aimed at allocating the European Union’s top jobs will continue at a special summit later this month after no majority could be reached on any candidate.
European Council president Donald Tusk said the leaders of the 28 member states would meet again on June 30, after discussions lasting four hours failed to reach a conclusion.
The leaders talked about the appointments until 1.45am local time (12.45am BST) on Friday at the Brussels summit, before adjourning until the end of the month.
Tusk told a press conference at 2am (1am BST): “The European Council had a full discussion of nominations, taking into account my consultations and statement made within the European Parliament.
“There was no majority on any candidate. The European Council agreed that there needs to be a package reflecting the diversity of the EU. We will meet again on 30th June.”
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, asked why he expected it would be easier to get a deal on the package of top jobs later in the month, replied: “I don’t expect that, but it has to be done.”
Theresa May left the summit on Friday morning after holding a one-to-one bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
The PM also dropped in to the UK Permanent Representation to the EU to talk to staff.
On Thursday evening, the leaders ate a distinctly British supper: dining on a starter of green asparagus with smoked salmon, followed by a main course of roast beef with rocket and potato cake, and for pudding they had strawberries with lime.
Theresa May – who had expected the summit to be her last as Prime Minister – said as she arrived that she would play a “constructive role” in the discussions.
Earlier, Tusk said that while he had been “cautiously optimistic” about making progress, he had become “more cautious than optimistic”.
The leaders discussed who should take over from Tusk and Juncker, amongst other roles.
It was hoped a new European Council president, European Commission president, European Central Bank president and EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy would be decided in the talks.
Discussions on the first day of the summit also focused on climate change, disinformation, the long-term EU budget and external relations.
The leaders failed to unanimously agree a decision to make the EU’s economy carbon neutral by 2050, with a footnote to the conclusions of the first day of the summit stating: “For a large majority of Member States, climate neutrality must be achieved by 2050.”
On Friday, the Council will discuss the Economic and Monetary Union and touch on the EU 27’s no-deal Brexit preparations ahead of a press conference with Mr Tusk and Juncker to conclude the summit.
The main political groupings in the Parliament have nominated candidates, including German MEP Manfred Weber, for the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), and former Dutch foreign minister Frans Timmermans, for the Party of European Socialists (PES).
The liberal group has put forward a “Spitzen Team” made up of figures including European Parliament Brexit co-ordinator Guy Verhofstadt and Danish EU Commissioner Margrethe Vestager.
However, Emmanuel Macron is thought to favour appointing the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, to the role of European Commission president, limiting Germany’s power in the bloc which would grow if Weber became Commission president.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel