FALSE submarine spy claims against a serving SNP councillor came from senior security figures, a tribunal has heard.
Chris McEleny told an employment tribunal in Glasgow how accusations that he had passed unauthorised photographs of nuclear submarines to his party while working as an MoD electrician left him suffering stress and depression.
Employment judge Lucy Wiseman was told that claim came after top security vetting experts ruled he was not a threat to national security.
READ MORE: Tribunal reconvenes for Chris McEleny vs MoD – here's the story so far
McEleny was suspended and had his security clearance removed amidst claims that he had IRA sympathies while standing to be SNP depute leader in 2016. He is now pursuing a case against his former employer for alleged discrimination on the basis of his political beliefs.
The tribunal has heard how McEleny was quizzed about a 2012 SNP conference speech about Nato membership and his opposition to Trident.
A vetting expert told the panel the hierarchy at HM Naval Base Clyde, home to the Trident fleet, had seen McEleny as a “spy in the camp”, but that no evidence to support this had been found.
The espionage claims were made by two senior security figures who The National cannot identify due to reporting restrictions.
McEleny said he feared these could lead to a trial and even treason allegations, if linked to the disproven IRA sympathies.
The claims were said to date back three years before they were reported and McEleny questioned why his accusers, who had serious security responsibilities, had not acted sooner.
When asked if he believed their concerns were legitimate, he said no.
He told the tribunal: “They simply didn’t want a guy who believes Scotland should be an independent country on their site.”
On the impact on his life, he stated: “Until you have been accused of a crime that can put you in jail for 14 years, you don’t know what it feels like.”
The tribunal continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel