THE BBC’s flagship Tory leadership debate has come under fire after an allegedly anti-Semitic imam and a former Labour party staffer were allowed to question the five men vying to replace Theresa May.
The BBC defended its vetting process, saying Abdullah Patel had hidden tweets from them and that he would not have been selected for the programme if they had been aware of his previous comments
In tweets, he had claimed that “every political figure on the Zionist’s payroll is scaring the world about Corbyn”.
He also shared an image endorsing the relocation of Israel to the US as a way of achieving peace.
In another post, he reportedly told women to not be alone with men.
He said: “Generally men are the predators, but women need to realise this and be smarter. It takes two to tango, and if you put yourself in that position, don’t expect every man to pass up the opportunity to take advantage of you. Don’t be alone with a man!”
Yesterday, he was suspended by the Al-Ashraf Primary School, where he works as a deputy head.
Yakub Patel, chairman of Al-Madani Educational Trust, said: “Following some of the comments attributed to Mr Patel in the media this morning, the trust has decided to suspend him from all school duties with immediate effect until a full investigation is carried out.
“The school and trust do not share the views attributed to him.”
Earlier, BBC Radio 5 Live presenter Nicky Campbell, who had Patel on his breakfast show, apologised and said the imam had made “extremely disturbing” remarks on Twitter and that he was “sorry” the broadcaster had not checked beforehand.
On Tuesday night’s show, Patel had asked the men about the impact of politicians’ words on Islamophobia, implicitly referencing Boris Johnson’s comments about women who wear the burqa resembling “letterboxes”.
Responding to the controversy, Home Secretary Sajid Javid tweeted that the imam, should “practice what he preaches”.
“Words do indeed have consequences.”
Meanwhile, it emerged that Aman Thakar – who questioned the Tory leadership candidates on a snap General Election – was a Labour Party candidate last year. He also worked briefly in the party’s HQ.
In a statement, the BBC said: “We carried out background research into the online and social media profiles of all our questioners for last night’s debate. After the debate, one individual reactivated a public Twitter account he had previously deactivated, whose tweets were not visible during our research period. Had we been aware of the views he expressed there, he would not have been selected.”
The corporation confirmed it had known Thakar had worked for Labour.
The SNP’s Keith Brown, said BBC bosses were refusing to learn lessons about vetting members of the public: “They have been well warned in recent months over the exposure of BBC Question’s Time audience selection processes but they clearly haven’t bothered to sort it out. With the huge resources that the BBC has at its disposal you’d have thought they might have been able to find a dozen people to come on and ask questions without repercussions”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel