Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has criticised plans for a citizens' assembly in Scotland, claiming they "lack ambition".
He praised the Scottish government for deciding to hold the assembly but warned it will not work if its terms of reference focus narrowly on Scottish independence.
The former Labour leader is an advocate of citizens' assemblies and believes they can fill a gap in the political system.
Earlier this week, the Scottish Government said 120 members of the public will be selected at random to serve on the assembly, with meetings held on six weekends between this autumn and spring 2020.
The three issues under consideration are: what kind of country Scotland should be; how it can overcome challenges including those arising from Brexit; and what further work is required to enable people to make informed choices on Scotland's future.
Writing in the Scotland On Sunday newspaper, Brown said: "Whether or not there is a future independence referendum, citizens' assemblies offer us the chance to have a more informed debate about the key issues affecting our economic and social future.
"But while the Scottish Government deserves credit for taking up the assembly idea, their current proposals - one citizens' assembly of 100 meeting six times - lack ambition.
"The better approach would be assemblies in every major region of the country - perhaps half a dozen - with 100 citizens in each.
"An online community of several hundred could be added to engage a wider number of citizens at little extra cost and with not 100 but 1,000 participating, the exercise would be far more inclusive.
"But the assemblies will not be seen as legitimate if their terms of reference are so narrow that all they do - as one independence supporting MSP suggested - is 'to debate the Yes/No question in a future referendum'.
"Indeed they would miss out on so much that matters in people's lives if they restricted the discussion to the constitution."
An SNP spokesman said: "We welcome Gordon Brown's support for citizens' assemblies."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel