LEGAL reforms will see judges urged to consider community sentences over prison sentences of 12 months or less for vulnerable women.
Scotland has one of the highest female prison populations in northern Europe, and around 90% of women sent to jail are given a custodial sentence of one year or less.
Extending the presumptions against short prison sentences would mean more women would receive a community-based sentence, said Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf.
He said the reforms are asking judges “to give serious consideration to community alternatives that prioritise rehabilitation”.
He added: “Many of the women currently serving prison sentences have complex needs that contribute to frequent offending.
“We should be helping them tackle those problems in the community so they can escape prison’s revolving door, rather than taking away what stability they have in their home and family.
“More than two thirds of female prisoners are mothers and we must not underestimate the trauma to their children of seeing their parent go to jail.
“From stressful home and school moves, to poor academic performance and mental health risks, parental imprisonment can trigger lifelong issues.”
A report by the Scottish Prison Service found around 60% of female prisoners reported four or more adverse childhood experiences, while around half reported being involved with problem drug taking outside custody.
Tom Halpin, chief executive of Sacro, which works with justice services to reduce offending, said: “We already know short prison sentences are ineffective in rehabilitating people but the adverse effect on women particularly can be damaging, for them and their families.
“The reasons why women become involved in offending are complex and varied.
“These root causes often involve trauma and are best addressed by providing the appropriate support within the community where family relations can be maintained.
“We must not underestimate the effect on children of having a mother in prison.
“This experience is often extremely damaging on their development and life chances and can increase their chances of becoming involved in the criminal justice system later.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel