Liberal Democrats should have halted the so-called "bedroom tax" when they were in coalition with the Tories, party leadership contender Jo Swinson said.
While she defended the five years her party spent as junior partners in David Cameron's government, Swinson - the current deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats - said they should have stopped welfare changes that see benefit recipients lose cash if they have spare rooms.
Speaking on BBC's Andrew Marr Show, the Lib Dem MP, who served as a minister in the coalition government, stated: "It was just not the right policy, we shouldn't have let that through."
However, she said there was a need to "constrain spending" when the Conservative/Liberal Democrat government came in in 2010.
And while she also accepted her party should not have voted to increase university tuition fees south of the border, Swinson insisted the Lib Dems "did do a lot of good" over the five years of the coalition.
She stated: "In 2010 with the financial crisis that was unfolding, we did need to make cuts."
She added: "We stopped a lot of welfare cuts but equally the bedroom tax was an example where we shouldn't have.
"We didn't get everything right in coalition, but we did do a lot of good.
"We were in a coalition and we had to compromise on various issues, that is the essence of coalition."
Swinson, who recaptured her East Dunbartonshire constituency in 2017 after losing it to the SNP two years before, is running against Sir Ed Davey to be the next leader of the Liberal Democrats.
The party's current leader, Sir Vince Cable, is stepping down from the role, with his successor to be elected by July 23.
She said: "I think we are at a pivotal moment in our politics where the two party structure is fracturing and there is a real appetite for a Liberal movement, for people who believe in our values, who say immigration is a good thing, that we need to reshape our economy so that it works for people and the planet.
"And those people are joining us in their thousands and I want to lead the Liberal Democrats to build that Liberal movement."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel