In her new book, Hannah Critchlow, Science Outreach Fellow at Cambridge’s Magdalene College, tackles two of the great unanswered questions: whether nature or nurture has the upper hand, and whether human beings can be said to have free will.
Presenting her account of the current state of neurological and genome research, she enthusiastically reports that “the latest neuroscience breathes new life into the concept of fate by situating it at the core of what we increasingly believe makes us who we are: the brain."
Her findings might initially make depressing reading, as they suggest that, by the time we’re born, our DNA has already decided on the kind of person we’re going to be. Predispositions to such conditions as depression, obesity and addiction are basically hardwired into our brains. The decisions we make will be strongly influenced by characteristics inherited from our parents, as well as the unconscious preferences common to our species (such as the ability to smell a mate with a contrasting immune system, giving offspring broader resistance to disease).
Given the mammoth amount of work it does every second, the brain doesn’t like to expend precious energy creating new neural pathways, preferring instead to interpret new information in terms of our established biases. So, thanks to “a combination of species-wide biological constraints and our own idiosyncratic blend of genetic inheritance and cognitive biases”, our beliefs and actions are rooted in a perception of the world which is not under conscious control and which varies from person to person. It’s a restriction which can keep people stuck in a cycle of self-destructive behaviour as easily as it can prevent us updating our opinions in response to new evidence.
Critchlow is at her most compelling in the chapters dealing with belief, which are based on “the most awe-inspiring results” in current neurological research. But it would be a mistake to think that our paths through life are completely fixed. Environmental and socioeconomic factors can mitigate our genetic destiny, at least to an extent. There is enough flexibility in the brain for “disordered” or negative ways of thinking to be coaxed in a healthier direction, particularly when it’s taken into account that, as we have seen, “reality is not an objective and immovable concept”. Critchlow notes especially positive results for MAP (mental and physical) training to combat depression.
Although immersed in the microscopic world of DNA, neurons and synapses, Critchlow is most concerned with society as a whole, arguing that “we need a compassion-based mindset more than ever”. Towards the end, she asserts that, based on what she’s learned, societies can be “collectively nudged” towards healthier, more altruistic behaviour. And this isn’t just an opinion from the crank fringes: the UK Government set up a Behavioural Insights Team which thinks along the same lines.
For a book that drives home what slaves we are to our dopamine receptors, and explores the extent to which our “fate” is governed by unconscious forces over which we have only limited control, it’s an unexpectedly upbeat and welcome conclusion.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here