THE Tories never stop banging on about referendums. More accurately, they never stop banging on about not having referendums, or they accuse others of always banging on about referendums.
So isn’t the irony bloody delicious when the very thing that is currently tearing the Conservative and Unionist Party apart is the prospect of a second referendum on Brexit – specifically, Theresa May offering MPs a vote on a second referendum if they ratify her deal.
So no longer should we hear the likes of Ruth Davidson at FMQs telling everyone to stop bringing up second referendums, when the very leader of her party is proposing a vote on one.
It is a desperate last-ditch attempt to save face and to pass her “new” and “bold” Brexit deal. But MPs have seen through this and are fully aware that all that means is that May has had a new cover put on her deal and had the font made bold.
In the last week or so, things gone from the absolute worst to somehow worse for the PM.
Polling in the build-up to the European Parliament election has had the Brexit Party on course for victory, as disaffected Tory voters leave in their droves and pile behind Nigel Farage’s latest one-issue party.
READ MORE: Tories set for historic defeat as voters quit party
Then, last night – on the eve of an election – Commons leader Andrea Leadsom quit May’s Cabinet, which definitely is not an appeal to the hard Brexiteers in the party and is in no way related to her own visions as a leader. Nope...
In her resignation letter, Leadsom questioned whether or not May’s deal is hard enough and said holding another referendum would be “dangerously divisive” and "risk undermining our Union which is something I passionately want to see strengthened".
Many more Tories are either openly or privately angry with the PM, including the likes of Jeremy Hunt, Sajid Javid and Dominic Raab.
Yet more rumours are abound that this is the end for May, but we’re not holding our breath as the teflon PM has survived on many an occasion when anyone with a modicum of self-awareness would have quit.
But when she does quit, it will be a matter of into the frying pan and into the fire as hard Brexiteers line up to replace her...
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel