SCOTTISH Independence convention convener Elaine C Smith has spoken exclusively to The National about Voices For Scotland, the convention’s new campaign organisation.
The non-party, civic body will aim to engage voters on independence, mainly targeting people who voted No in 2014 but may be prepared to change their minds.
Speaking as a guest on the Wee Ginger Dugcast with Paul Kavanagh and The National editor Callum Baird, Smith said Voices For Scotland will seek out the opinions of No voters to establish what could convince them to support independence.
“I want to hear from the people who voted No, because that’s who we’ve got to take with us,” she said.
She explained that the organisation would reach out to those who voted to remain in the Union in 2014 and say: “If you voted No, you weren’t necessarily wrong.”
Looking ahead to a second independence referendum, Smith said: “I think the tone of the next campaign has to be more conciliatory, it has to take the [Yes] movement with us but it also has to speak to the hearts of all people.”
Summing up her message to Scots, she said: “Let’s be realistic, running a country is hard ... there will be difficult decisions to take. But are the decisions better taken her than looking down and thinking ‘Aw it’s ok, all those guys that went to Eton, they’ll know better than us’?
“It’s been demonstrated so many times by the leaders from down south coming up to Scotland – they haven’t a clue.”
You can listen to the latest Wee Ginger Dugcast via thenational.scot from 3.30pm today. To subscribe, visit The National Politics Podcast on soundcloud.com
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel