THE Scottish Government should scrap benefits and give every adult a basic income to eliminate poverty, a report has said.
Paying an initial basic income of £2400 a year, which would eventually be raised to £4800, would eradicate destitution in Scotland, the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA) has claimed.
The charity has called for Holyrood to pilot a basic income scheme by axing sanction-led employment
benefits and the personal tax allowance in favour of a regular, unconditional payment of £2400 per adult, or £1500 per child, per year.
Its report found “child destitution would vanish almost immediately” if an initial basic income was introduced, and if it reached the full £4800 it could “completely eliminate destitution in Scotland”.
Speaking at an RSA event, shadow chancellor John McDonnell said Labour would explore the idea of paying a basic income.
Jamie Cooke, head of RSA Scotland, said: “Basic income is increasingly of global interest and Scotland is at the brink of doing something very different and bringing the first basic income pilots to the UK.
“Our research shows how an initial basic income could be introduced in Scotland in a way that is progressive, affordable and would halve destitution, while paving the way for a full basic income in the future. But the idea must be tested – and our engagement with Scottish citizens found support for experimenting against today’s discredited Universal Credit system, which is why we suggest a robust stepping stone before a ‘full’ basic income is introduced.
“The idea has supporters from the SNP, Scottish Labour and the Greens, as well as others. We need to see a cross-party agreement to introduce pilots in Scotland. Obviously having the support of the UK Government of the day will be key, and John McDonnell’s support this week makes this more likely. But, failing this, the Scottish Government should pursue all options to delivering this – including invoking Exception 10 of the Scotland Act 2016 and developing a civil-society led UBI.”
Three scenarios were modelled in the report – the status quo; a £2400 per adult basic income; and the full basic income of £4800.
The research found that the full basic income would be the most fiscally progressive but cost the most at 3.5% of Scotland’s GDP, while the partial basic income would be easier to fund due to the removal of the tax allowance, costing 1.2% of GDP.
Anthony Painter, director of action and research at the RSA, added: “Under austerity, we have seen the state stepping back in terms of the cash support it offers people, while increasingly stepping in to police the behaviour of the people needing cash support.
“Basic income has been tested and shown to have a positive impact on wellbeing and trust without reducing participation in the labour market overall.
“Meanwhile Universal Credit – relying on sanctions to control individuals – has been shown to have damaging effects on health, wellbeing and trust, and creates greater economic insecurity.
“This means we must consider a basic income to promote economic security and freedom, as an alternative to today’s unpopular, threadbare and hostile welfare state.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel