THE SNP have condemned a leading Scottish Tory for saying government policy on the rape clause is "not an easy one" for Conservatives to deal with.
Brian Whittle, the sport and wellbeing spokesman for the Conservatives at Holyrood, said "great marketing" by opposition parties had seen them use the policy to attack the Government.
SNP MP Alison Thewliss branded Whittle's remark as "offensive" and "totally heartless".
She added:"Brian Whittle's comments are not only offensive, they're totally heartless.
"He seems to be in total denial about the hardship and misery his own party is causing.
"The 'rape clause' is not a political invention - it's an utterly horrific policy of the Tory government, which has forced families across Scotland and the UK into poverty."
Labour shadow Scottish secretary Lesley Laird insisted it was "absolutely shameful" that Conservatives, including Ruth Davidson, support the "despicable Tory rape clause".
But speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative Aberdeen conference, Whittle argued it was "legitimate" to debate the limits that should be put on benefit payments.
He said: "The thing about the rape clause, and I think it is fair to say the opposition have grasped hold of that and are driving that really hard into us, the thing is this, we're looking at a system where the question is, should there be an upper limit on social benefits, and that's a debate that has to happen and it's a very legitimate debate "We think there should be a limit to what social security payments should be, and if we agree to what social security payments should be, you would accept there have to be exemptions to that."
He added that if the party had not included an exemption to the policy – which limits to two the number of children for which families can claim tax credits –they would have been "massively criticised".
But Whittle said Tories were "getting beaten" for doing that, when "the actual debate is around social security benefits, should there be an upper limit, what it should be, and if there isn't an upper limit how does that encourage people to go back into work".
He continued: "It's not an easy one for Conservatives to get round, and I've been beaten for that as well.
"But there is a legitimate debate to be had here that is not being had."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel