A NEW poll commissioned by Unionists has found that the majority of Scots want a second independence referendum.
The research by Survation, commissioned by Scotland in Union, also found that the SNP are on course to win 51 of Scotland’s 59 seats.
SNP depute leader Keith Brown said the poll had “backfired in spectacular style” on the Unionists.
READ MORE: SNP brush off Tory Section 30 order claims
The backing for a second independence referendum came after the First Minister fired the starting gun for one on Wednesday, as a bid to protect the country against Brexit.
The polling also found that 61% of people wanted to stay in the Union, and 39% leave – but the options were worded as “Remain” and “Leave”, as in the Brexit vote where Scotland backed Remain, rather than the familiar “Yes” and “No” options.
Of the 57% who backed a second indyref2, the most popular option was the First Minister’s timescale of holding it within the next two years – backed by 21% of respondents.
A total of 17% wanted another vote, but not for at least 10 years; 9% wanted indyref2 in five to 10 years; and 10% said it should be held in two to five years.
With 8% undecided, only 34% thought there should never be another referendum – well below the 57% open to another vote.
When it came to the Westminster election, the poll put the SNP on 41%. Labour were well behind in second place at 24%, with the Tories trailing them with 22% and the LibDems on 8%.
READ MORE: Richard Leonard doesn't 'deserve' to be FM, Nicola Sturgeon says
The Electoral Calculus website predicts this as resulting in 51 MPs for the SNP at Westminster – a gain of 16 – with only three Scottish Tories and one MP for Labour.
SNP depute Brown said: “This poll has backfired in spectacular style for Scotland in Union, who are clearly running scared of giving people in Scotland the choice over their future.
“The SNP meets for our Spring Conference with the wind in our sails, while the Unionist parties continue to languish in the political doldrums.
“This poll shows that almost two thirds of people back another referendum and that a majority think Scotland would be better off or no worse off with independence.
“That’s a great vote of confidence in the benefits of taking our future into our own hands.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here