The boss of craft beer-maker BrewDog has slammed the lack of clarity surrounding Brexit.
Speaking to PA, co-founder James Watt said the uncertainty has had a negative effect on British businesses.
Watt warned of “what he called “severe long-term damage” to the UK’s economy and entrepreneurs.
“Businesses need to know where they stand, need to know whether to invest, if they can build infrastructure, if they can employ people,” he said.
“The uncertainty is having such a negative effect on UK businesses.”
He added BrewDog’s decision to buy the site of Stone Brewing in Berlin, which was announced earlier this month, was influenced by concerns over Brexit.
“It’s about having the ability to be able to supply our European customers given the political uncertainty,” he said.
BrewDog also plan to add a co-working space, beer-making experiences and a craft beer museum at the site, which would make it the company’s flagship location in mainland Europe.
The brewer which was set up in 2007 by Watt and his school friend Martin Dickie, announced at its AGM this month that it is open for its sixth equity crowdfunding raise, targeting £7 million.
Some of the money will be used to fund the refurbishment of the Berlin brewery.
It comes after BrewDog’s latest accounts showed made a loss before tax of almost £1.5 million in 2018 due to high levels of investment in opening new breweries and bars.
The company also filed its gender pay gap data this month, showing women’s median hourly wages at its core business are 3.3% higher than men’s.
Across BrewDog bars, women make 90p for each £1 earned by a man.
On average, UK firms have a 17.9% gap in favour of men.
Watt said the current system is not fit for purpose.
“How they calculate the gender pay gap is completely flawed,” he said.
“It doesn’t give you an accurate picture of how a company treats this issue in any way whatsoever.
“In my opinion, what I think is important is that people who do the same job at the same level are paid the same, regardless of their gender.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here