THE Law Society of Scotland has challenged the Scottish Government’s plans for a new defamation law which is currently out for consultation.
In its response to the draft bill, the Law Society says striking the right balance between freedom of expression and protection of reputation is key to modernising Scots defamation law. The society also highlighted in a statement the “perceived lack of clarity around the definition of public authority, some aspects of the drafting relating to the liability of secondary publishers, and concerns regarding the scope of delegated powers under the draft Bill which could lead to insufficient parliamentary scrutiny of key policy decisions”.
Also questioned are proposals to introduce a statutory threshold test of serious harm in relation to financial loss. The society does want to see defamation law on the statute book, saying: “While we do not consider that the lack of a statutory definition has proved problematic to date, this would make the law more accessible as it would all be found in one place. At the same time, this approach would allow us to retain the benefits of existing jurisprudence which gives greater detail to the way in which the test should be interpret.”
John Paul Sheridan of the Law Society of Scotland’s Obligations Law Sub-Committee said: “Evidence of vexatious litigation should be provided if a ‘serious harm’ test is to be introduced as we are not aware that there is currently a problem in Scotland. There is a balance to be found between the right of freedom of expression, as found in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and the right of protection of individual reputation. From an access to justice perspective, we are concerned that introducing a statutory threshold could deter legitimate claims.
“There may also be practical challenges around preliminary hearings to assess whether significant harm has occurred.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here