JUST when you think politics can’t get any more bizarre, up comes a new idea on how to save politicians from themselves.
They should get themselves a new branding, say award-winning creative director Radim Malinic and Professor Phil Cleaver who consulted on a new project to rebrand five major political parties, along with the newly formed Independent Group. The political rebranding exercise is led by Solopress who presumably think they will get some orders for print material. To be fair Radim Malinic has a point: “The UK political parties’ design systems seem too disjointed, inconsistent and lacking the full impact they could have.”
Or else the majority of them have their heads stuck in the Brexit quicksand and can’t see the way ahead – a remark that mighty apply to the SNP on indyref2, it should be said.
Simon Cooper, managing director of Solopress, said: “The current state of British politics inspired us to imagine how political parties could connect better with voters. Branding is so important to other big businesses and why should it be any different for political parties?”
Leave it to the academic to state the bleedin’ obvious. Middlesex University Professor Cleaver said: “In a crowded marketplace of brands, people place high value on perceived authenticity. Aligning your political message to appropriate visual communication helps to strengthen the credibility of your claims. Which, in turn, can hopefully lead to the trust of your voters.”
Or not, as the case might be. As to Solopress’s suggested new brands, the SNP would have to rip up several million posters and leaflets to replace their yellow and black colours with blue and white – and didn’t the researchers know the Yoons always accused the SNP of hijacking the saltire?
As for the Tories and Labour’s new suggested brands, all the rebranding in all the world won’t cast a fig leaf over the truth that both parties are in very big trouble, not because their logos and slogans are rubbish but because their policies and leaders are dire.
So, here’s our suggestion for a new branding for Labour: a pound of mince past its sell-by date. As for the Tories? How about a chicken having its neck wrung with an orange sash. Oh, and both of them covered in red, white and blue flags to emphasise their roots in a Union that Scotland no longer wants or needs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel