THERESA May has been warned ministers risk “stumbling into the next phase of negotiations with the EU without a plan” putting the UK at a disadvantage in the “tougher” second stage of Brexit.
The warning comes in a highly critical report by the Institute for Government think tank which also recommends the Government should involve the devolved nations early and consistently in the process.
It gives a damning assessment of how the Government handled the first phase of the Brexit process saying the UK Government’s approach "was bedevilled by the absence of Cabinet agreement” and that “politicians, particularly on the Government backbenches, did not trust the UK’s official negotiators”.
It added: “The Government engaged Parliament late, alienated the devolved governments and failed to make use of external expertise”.
The authors warn talks to hammer out a final deal to determine ongoing relations between the UK and the EU are expected to be tougher than the divorce phase of the talks which ended last year with May’s withdrawal agreement – now the subject of a Commons deadlock.
Published today – Negotiating Brexit: Preparing for talks on the UK’s future relationship with the EU – it recommends before negotiations on the future relationship begin, the Government should publish its ambition for the way ahead without drawing red lines.
It recommends that: “The PM appoints a ministerial deputy, based in the Cabinet Office, to oversee the day-to-day negotiations (taking that role away from DExEU).
“The Government finds a way to use the expertise in the Department for International Trade (DIT) whose staff currently have little role in the EU negotiations.
"The Government should engage Parliament and the devolved administrations early and consistently."
Brexit Secretary Michael Russell said: “This report merely confirms what we have... said – Scotland has been ignored by the UK Government throughout the Brexit process with scant, if any, notice taken of our overwhelming vote to remain in the EU. The Scottish Government’s detailed compromise proposals have also been ignored or dismissed at every turn.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel