BORIS Johnson was wrong to claim a no-deal Brexit was the UK's preferred option, press regulator Ipso has ruled.
The Tory MP made the claim in an opinion piece in the Telegraph at the start of this year, titled "The British people won't be scared into backing a woeful Brexit deal nobody voted for".
But Ipso said the article, published on January 7, failed to provide accurate information with "a basis in fact" and ordered a correction to be printed.
The Daily Telegraph defended the piece as "clearly comically polemical" which could not be "reasonably read as a serious, empirical, in-depth analysis of hard factual matters".
The newspaper claimed various combinations of results in four polls reflected support for a no-deal scenario over Theresa May's deal or remaining in the EU, and it was "inevitable" that subjectivity would affect interpretation of results.
But the complainant said that no poll available at the time of publication, or provided by the publication in defence of this statement, supported these claims.
And the Ipso panel said the results of opinion polls referenced by the newspaper did not show support for no deal and this was "a significant inaccuracy".
They said: "(The newspaper) had construed the polls as signalling support for a no-deal, when in fact this was the result of the publication either amalgamating several findings together, or interpreting an option beyond what was set out by the poll as being a finding in support of a no-deal Brexit.
"This represented a failure to take care over the accuracy of the article ... it was a significant inaccuracy, because it misrepresented polling information."
A correction will appear in the newspaper's established Corrections and Clarifications column and also as a footnote to the online article.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel