NICOLA Sturgeon has backed a suggestion that there could be an “exodus” of Labour members if the party were to agree to a Brexit deal which ended freedom of movement.
Former Scottish Labour chair Jamie Glackin tweeted that he would be part of a wave of departures under such circumstances.
READ MORE: May urges both sides to compromise as she faces backlash for talks with Labour
“If the Labour Party signs up to a deal ending free movement then watch the exodus. Starting with me,” he wrote.
The First Minister responded: “I suspect this will be the view of many members/supporters of Scottish Labour should such a deal be done.”
The development came amid talks between Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and the Prime Minister in a bid to reach a compromise on her Brexit deal and resolve a Commons stalemate.
Theresa May has repeatedly underlined one of her red lines is to oppose single market membership which would entail freedom of movement as she wants to restrict immigration from the EU. Corbyn has also opposed freedom of movement, however under internal party pressure Labour has softened its position, with shadow Brexit Secretary Sir Keir Starmer saying the UK should “explore” allowing qualified free movement of workers from the EU after Brexit.
READ MORE: Brexit crisis as talks between May and Corbyn flop
In February, he called for alignment with the EU’s single market.
Last night one Labour insider said opposing freedom of movement could be the last straw for many members across the UK.
“Apart from some parts of the north of England, I would say Labour members do back freedom of movement. Most Labour MPs in the UK are in big cities – London, Liverpool, Manchester – where there is a recognition of the importance of freedom of movement,” said the insider.
“I think lots of members would leave if Labour backed a deal which didn’t include freedom of movement.
"For many it would be the final straw. The Labour party is an internationalist party which believes in solidarity with workers across the globe, and to oppose freedom of movement would go against the founding principles of the party.”
READ MORE: What exactly is a customs union and why are MPs divided on it?
Sturgeon’s warning follows remarks by SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford, pictured below, that Labour will pay a price at the ballot box in Scotland if a deal with the Tories increases the risk of a hard Brexit. Blackford said if someone like Boris Johnson were to become PM, the risk of a hard Brexit would be “very real”.
He told BBC Sunday Politics Scotland: “There are no guarantees through this process, and the risk of having a hard Brexit, having Scotland being outwith not just the single market and the customs union, would be very real, and I would say to Labour don’t do this, be very careful with what you are doing or quite simply you will pay a price at the ballot box in Scotland.”
A Labour for the single market campaign was launched last year and backed by politicians such as the Edinburgh South MP Ian Murray, former Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale and the former MEP Catherine Stihler.
Last year, a row broke out ahead of the Scottish Labour conference after its leadership moved to block a vote on single market membership. Pro-single market campaigners had hoped to use a Brexit debate to call for the UK to remain in the trading bloc. But the party’s ruling body said the “situation regarding Brexit has changed significantly” in recent weeks.
READ MORE: Will there be an indyref2 announcement? What to expect this week
At the time Stihler said there was “simply no left-wing argument for leaving the European single market” as it protected workers’ rights.
She added: “It will be disappointing if members who support single market membership don’t get the opportunity to put that to a vote, but the campaign to protect jobs and defend workers’ rights will continue.”
Glackin said at the time that a “healthy party” would encourage members to express their views, adding: The days of control freakery in the Labour machine have not actually gone at all.
"Indeed ... it does look like it has got significantly worse.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel