Poor standards of clinical practice at NHS Borders are putting vulnerable adults and children at risk, a senior staff member has claimed.
Dawn Saunders, head of audiology at the health board, said she and colleagues have raised numerous concerns over the last 18 months "to no avail".
Saunders, who is currently suspended from her post, alleges a case of negligence when "a patient came to harm through having his ear drum perforated as the direct result of poor clinical practice."
READ MORE: NHS Tayside: Probe into 14 cancer deaths amid chemotherapy scandal
In response, NHS Borders said it was confident its clinicians were competent and patients were not at risk.
The claims were made in letter to the Herald newspaper, which states: "The culture within NHS Borders is accepting of extremely poor standards of clinical practice that put vulnerable adults and children at risk every day."
The letter from Saunders and senior audiologists Beverley Herne and Sara Doggett said: "Despite the organisation having accepted that there is an issue it has to date failed to address any of the matters identified within our complaints or implement any measures to reduce the risk to patients."
They said whistleblowers were subject to "continuous victimisation and bullying by senior management in an attempt to silence concerns and furthermore exit such employees from the organisation".
READ MORE: Here's why we shouldn’t find Tory MSP’s stance on the NHS astonishing
NHS Borders confirmed anonymous whistleblowing concerns had been raised about patient safety in the audiology department.
Nicky Berry, director of nursing, midwifery and allied health professionals, and director of acute services at the board, said: "It is important that we honour the request for anonymity from the whistleblowers as reassurance to all of our staff that it is safe and acceptable to speak up in the event that they wish to raise concerns.
"We can confirm that in this case we immediately took external expert advice from senior audiologists from another health board who raised no immediate patient safety concerns.
"They did however highlight some areas where practice could be improved and that is moving forward.
"An investigation into the concerns was instigated promptly, which has been completed with the recommendations agreed with the whistleblowers."
Berry added: "We are not putting our patients at risk.
"The external advice from another health board about the clinical competency of our staff has been given and we have had confirmation that our audiology staff are competent clinicians capable of the work assigned to them.
"Any ongoing matters that are being dealt with through our internal employment policies are confidential between the employer and employee.
"However, we would say that in all cases suspension is a neutral act, not a disciplinary action, and alternatives are always considered."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here