TRANSPORT Secretary Michael Matheson is pressing the UK Government to ensure that time sensitive exports, such as Scottish seafood, can continue to reach mainland Europe if there is a no-deal EU withdrawal.
Matheson has written to the UK Transport Secretary Chris Grayling to demand that critical exports are given priority access to the additional ferry capacity secured by the UK Government when it is not being used to transport essential supplies.
READ MORE: The cost of no deal Brexit to Scotland revealed: £14 BILLION every year
In his letter, Matheson highlights his concern that the Department for Transport has failed to take action despite the concerns being raised in previous correspondence from the Scottish Government.
Matheson said: “The Scottish Government is clear that remaining in the EU is in Scotland’s best interests, however we have to plan for all possible outcomes, including a no-deal exit which would have serious consequences for our exports and wider economy.
“With an annual value of £944 million, seafood accounts for 58% of Scotland’s total food exports.
“Seafood is highly perishable and therefore dependent on the sort of swift and reliable transport connections which would be damaged by a disorderly UK exit from the EU.
“The Scottish Government has, on a number of occasions, sought to have seafood and other time critical exports prioritised through Kent and Dover.
“We have also asked that these exports are given priority access to the additional ferry capacity secured by the UK Government where this is not required for essential supplies. So far, these requests have been refused.
READ MORE: CBI Scotland warns no-deal Brexit threatens £3.9bn in exports
“This lack of support for exporting businesses, which threatens the livelihoods of many in Scotland especially in our more remote and rural communities, is of great concern to us and to the industries affected.
“The current situation, which puts at risk jobs and livelihoods, is simply not acceptable.
“I am asking the UK Government to look again at the issues of prioritisation, and more generally at what assurance they can give businesses that their critical routes to market will be maintained in the event of a no deal.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here