A SCOTTISH health board's treatment of 14 breast cancer patients who died will be reviewed by an independent expert after bosses admitted hundreds of patients were given lower doses of chemotherapy.
NHS Tayside is changing its chemotherapy treatment after a watchdog report found patients were being given a lower dose of drugs than in the rest of Scotland.
Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) found patients were not informed about the difference in treatment at the time.
The health board has since written to 304 patients who had chemotherapy for breast cancer from December 1, 2016, to this month. They have been offered an appointment with an oncologist.
NHS Tayside has now said 14 of these patients are dead and an independent expert will review the treatment these women were given.
READ MORE: NHS Tayside chief executive’s pay-off doubled due to blunder
A spokesman for the health board said: "As part of our response to the HIS report, NHS Tayside asked an independent expert to review the breast cancer chemotherapy treatment of 14 patients who have died.
"These patients received breast cancer chemotherapy during the time period December 1, 2016, until March 31, 2019. The findings will be shared with the families."
Chief Medical Officer, Dr Catherine Calderwood, and Chief Pharmaceutical Officer, Dr Rose Marie Parr, ordered HIS to carry out an investigation after concerns were raised "about variations in treatment compared with other health boards in Scotland".
The report warned of a possible "dysfunctional team environment" in NHS Tayside, with debate on the issue said to be "stifled".
Other medical professionals within the board "expressed concern" about the lower dosage, the report said.
For patients being treated with a FEC-T regimen of chemotherapy, oncologists in NHS Grampian and NHS Highland recommended doses of 100mg/m2 of two of the drugs, Epirubicin and docetaxel, while in Tayside the recommended dosage was 75mg/m2 of Epirubicin and 80mg/m2 of docetaxel.
The report noted the practice in NHS Tayside was "also at variance with the rest of NHS Scotland".
The "NHS Tayside breast oncology consultant team confirmed that patients were not informed of dosage or variation in dosage during the consent process", the report said.
Doctors there had argued their practice was "in the best interests of patients in NHS Tayside", saying that when higher doses of the drugs had been used in 2014-15, 51 of 98 patients had needed to have their dosage reduced.
The health board's acting medical director, professor Peter Stonebridge, apologised for any "distress" caused by the report.
He added: "We have taken assurance from the expert panel who has said that the risk of any negative impact to patients arising from the change in chemotherapy was very small.
"However, patient safety is always our number one priority and that is why we have taken action to rapidly change our approach to breast cancer chemotherapy, ensuring it is in line with practice across the rest of Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here