THERESA May is to write to European Council president Donald Tusk today with the UK's request for a further delay to Brexit, a Downing Street source has said.
The extension request could be for up to a further year, amid reports that EU officials are considering offering the PM a flexible extension – or "flextension" – to the Article 50 timetable.
European Council president Donald Tusk is preparing to put the option to EU leaders at a crunch summit next Wednesday in a bid to prevent the UK crashing out of the bloc on April 12, according to the BBC.
Top-level talks aimed at finding a way out of the Brexit deadlock will continue between the Government and Labour.
READ MORE: Brexit deal no closer after two days of Tory-Labour talks
The discussions are taking place as Prime Minister Theresa May faces a week of hectic diplomacy as she battles to keep her EU withdrawal agenda on track.
As Government talks with Labour on EU withdrawal went into another day, the issue of a new Brexit referendum continued to be a focus of attention.
Ministers have considered the possibility of giving MPs a vote on holding a referendum on a deal as part of the talks with Labour, the Daily Telegraph reported.
It is understood the Government could set out proposals to Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn in a letter today.
And May faced a continued challenge to her authority from Parliament as the House of Lords debated a Bill aimed at extending the Brexit process in a bid to avoid a no-deal scenario.
The remaining stages of the European Union Withdrawal (No.5) Bill will be considered by peers on Monday, threatening a new political headache for the PM if it is approved.
The Bill, brought forward by backbenchers including Labour's Yvette Cooper, allows Parliament to determine the length of any Brexit extension the Prime Minister should request at the EU summit on April 10.
If the European Council proposes a different extension, May would be required to return to the Commons to obtain MPs' approval.
Attorney General Geoffrey Cox said the Bill would leave the PM with little room to manoeuvre.
Referring to the Bill's impact on a no-deal option, the Attorney General told the BBC: "It rules it out ... the Prime Minister would have little choice but to accept the extension that she's offered."
Cox said if the talks with Labour failed there would be repercussions.
He said: "The problem, then, would be that we would be in an extension. It's likely to be a long one, by which I mean longer than just a few weeks or months."
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: 'No sign of Theresa May compromising on Brexit deal'
Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh predicted a number of her colleagues could quit the party over the issue of a new referendum.
McDonagh told the BBC: "There is going to be outrage if we don't get a second vote.
"Would it be the thing that made me leave the party? I don't think so, there are other issues for me.
"But, would it make some of my colleagues in the parliamentary Labour Party? Yes, a number have said to me that would be the moment that they would leave."
However, a number of Labour MPs representing Leave areas have come out against the idea of a confirmatory referendum.
Talks between the Government and Labour lasted four-and-a-half hours on Thursday.
David Lidington, effectively the deputy prime minister, led the Government's negotiating team with Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay, Chief Whip Julian Smith, Business Secretary Greg Clark and Theresa May's chief of staff Gavin Barwell.
On the other side of the table were shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer and shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey along with senior Labour officials.
Labour's victor in the Newport West by-election, Ruth Jones, said she is against a no-deal exit from the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel