Here's your guide to the Brexit motions going in front of the House of Commons tonight as indicative votes...
C: Customs union
This motion, tabled by Tory veteran and EU supporter Ken Clarke would commit the government to negotiate "a permanent and comprehensive UK-wide customs union with the EU".
This means a reduction in checks at the Irish border, but prevents the UK striking independent trade deals with other countries.
Of all the options, this came closest last time losing 272-264, by just eight votes.
D: Common Market 2.0
This, tabled by Tory MP Nick Boles, has received cross party support. It would mean the UK joining the European Free Trade Association and European Economic Area.
The UK would remain part of the EU single market, which means freedom of movement.
In the last round, 188 MPs voted for this plan and 283 voted against.
E: Confirmatory public vote
Tabled by Labour MPs Peter Kyle and Phil Wilson, this would give the public a vote to approve any Brexit deal passed by Parliament, before it can be implemented.
SNP and Labour will back it. Last week this was rejected 295-268
G: Parliamentary supremacy
Tabled by Joanna Cherry, this is a sort-of reset clause. If a deal has not been agreed two days before the deadline for leaving then it commits the government to seeking a long extension.
If Europe says no to an extension, then, on the day before Brexit, MPs will asked to choose between a no-deal Brexit or revoking Article 50 to stop Brexit altogether.
Labour are whipping for all motions tonight except this one, abstaining on it instead.. Expect a fairly sizeable rebellion though.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here