DAVID Mundell has faced repeated calls for him to support the revocation of Article 50, as one SNP MP claimed it was "time to rename his post the secretary of state against Scotland".
Cabinet minister Mundell told the Commons during Scotland questions, "I don't support a no-deal Brexit, but I don't support revoking Article 50", as he underlined his backing for Theresa May's Brexit deal.
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard (Edinburgh East) asked: "Will he still rule out a no-deal Brexit and if the only way to achieve that is to revoke Article 50 will he support that?"
He added: "I think we can only interpret from that, that there are circumstances in which the Secretary of State for Scotland will consent to a no-deal Brexit and in doing so he stands against the views of the national parliament of Scotland, of Scottish civil society and the overwhelming majority of the British people.
"So isn't it time now to rename his post the secretary of state against Scotland?"
The Secretary of State refuses to revoke Article 50 even if it's the only way to avoid a no deal #Brexit. Maybe his post should be renamed Secretary of State Against Scotland. pic.twitter.com/WBd5obkJj9
— Tommy Sheppard MP (@TommySheppard) March 27, 2019
Mundell replied: "I'm sure that line sounded better in the mirror ... this House has made it very, very clear that it will not accept a no-deal Brexit, what however we are committed to doing is ensuring that we deliver on the referendum and that means leaving with a deal and that's why I continue to support the Prime Minister's deal."
SNP Pete Wishart (Perth and North Perthshire) raised the Revoke Article 50 petition and the prospect of a second independence referendum.
He said: "Surely the Secretary of State agrees at some point the Scottish people are going to have to decide whether they want to go down with this disastrous isolated ugly Brexit Britain or whether they should determine their own way in Europe as an independent nation."
On revoking Article 50, Mundell replied: "I don't agree with him that is not implementing the outcome of the referendum. The best way for Scotland and the UK to proceed is to leave the EU with the Prime Minister's deal."
SNP deputy Westminster leader Kirsty Blackman (Aberdeen North) said the UK Government's own modelling showed any Brexit would mean that the people of Scotland would be worse off.
She added: "Will the Secretary of State now do his job, stand up for the people of Scotland and vote against any Brexit?"
SNP Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) added: "He is supposed to be the Secretary of State for Scotland and Scotland is against Brexit, so when is he going to do his job, stand up for Scotland, stand up to the Prime Minister and stop Scotland being taken out of the EU against its will?"
Mundell replied the issue was an "unwillingness to accept the outcome of the 2014 referendum".
"We had a UK referendum and the UK as whole voted to leave the EU," he said.
Shadow secretary of state for Scotland Lesley Laird said Mundell had "even failed to follow through on his own resignation threats".
She asked: "How bad does it need to get under this Tory Government for the people of Scotland before you do the right thing and actually resign?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel