Theresa May could bring back her Brexit deal to the Commons this week amid signs growing numbers of Tory rebels are now ready to back it, a senior Cabinet minister has said.
Leader of the House Andrea Leadsom said there was a "real possibility" there would be sufficient support for the Government to stage a third "meaningful vote", either on Thursday or Friday.
She said ministers were continuing to talk to MPs - including those in the DUP, who prop up the Government at Westminster and whose votes may be crucial in determining the outcome.
Leadsom told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think that there is a real possibility that it does (come back).
"We are completely determined to make sure that we can get enough support to bring it back."
Securing a "meaningful vote" this week would mean the Government had met the deadline set by the EU for an extension of the Article 50 withdrawal process to May 22 to allow it to complete the preparations for leaving.
Otherwise the Prime Minister will have to come forward with an alternative approach by April 12, which would involve either a lengthy delay or Britain leaving with no deal at all.
Her comments came as a number of leading Conservative Brexiteers signalled they were ready to fall into line amid fears Brexit could be lost altogether if it does not get through.
With MPs set to stage a series of "indicative votes" on alternatives to May's plan, Jacob Rees-Mogg, the chairman of the European Research Group, said there was a "concerted attempt" to prevent Britain leaving.
"I think that we have got to the point where legally leaving is better than not leaving at all," he told Today.
"Half a loaf is better than no bread."
He said his only condition for supporting the deal was that May wins round the DUP, who continue to hold out against the plan.
"I won't abandon the DUP because I think they are the guardians of the union of the United Kingdom," he said.
His comments came after Brexit figurehead Boris Johnson hinted on Tuesday he might be ready to swing behind the deal.
"If we vote it down again, for the third time, there is now, I think, an appreciable risk that we will not leave at all," he told an audience of Daily Telegraph readers.
But the former foreign secretary stressed he was "not there yet" and indicated a change at the top of the party may be required to win him over.
He said: "If people like me are to support this deal ... then we need to see the proof that the second phase of negotiations will be different from the first."
With deep frustration across the party, May is expected to face calls to name the date of the departure when she addresses the Conservative backbench 1922 Committee immediately before Wednesday's votes.
Rees-Mogg said he was not calling for her to say when she intended to go but added: "I am aware that it is an issue for some other people."
Leadsom, however, refused to to be drawn on whether May should continue to lead the Government once the Withdrawal Agreement had been approved.
"I think that is a matter for her, I am not expressing a view," she said.
She added: "I am fully supporting the Prime Minister to get us out of the European Union."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel