GEORGE Galloway breached broadcasting rules by presenting allegations of Labour Party anti-Semitism as a concocted means to criticise Jeremy Corbyn, a watchdog has found.
The former MP's talkRadio platform could now face sanctions including the shortening or revoking of its licence after Ofcom found Galloway was in breach of impartiality rules.
Hosting phone-ins on the Labour anti-Semitism allegations, Galloway was found to have framed the controversy as a vehicle to attack the Labour Leader, and received broad support for his view.
When he received a dissenting opinion in a text, Galloway called the sender an "ignorant woman", and branded another listener who disagreed with him as a "rag picker".
Galloway was found in breach on two counts over the Corbyn material. In addition to a previous broadcast on the Salisbury poisoning case, Galloway has been found in breach of the rules by Ofcom three times. The watchdog is now considering sanctions against his radio platform.
A spokesman for Ofcom said: "Our investigation found that these phone-in programmes breached our due impartiality rules. They failed to give due weight to a sufficiently wide range of views on allegations of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party.
"We are minded to consider imposing a statutory sanction for these breaches. The Licensee now has an opportunity to make representations to us, which we'll consider before proceeding further."
Ofcom received complaints about Galloway's shows on July 27 and August 6 2018, prompting an investigation into due impartiality.
The watchdog found that while it was legitimate to broadcast programmes in support of Corbyn, principles of balance had to be maintained.
Ofcom said it is concerned that Galloway continues to "express pride" in his broadcasts despite their content breaching rules.
TalkRadio could now face sanctions, which may include a fine of up to £250,000, in light of the fact that Galloway has been found in breach of the rules multiple times on the station.
Galloway's show has previously breached impartiality rules with comments that aired after the Salisbury poisoning involving Yulia and Sergei Skripal.
On three occasions, when the audience contributions opposed his own views position, Galloway joked that the listeners who had sent in their dissenting messages were in Broadmoor psychiatric hospital.
Ofcom investigated a complaint that the programme, broadcast on March 16, contained "biased and unbalanced views" about the response of the UK and Russian governments to the poisoning.
Galloway said in the introduction to his July 27 show: "Jeremy Corbyn has this week been the victim of a crazed, unhinged assault by the agents of the powerful. A frenzied attack to destroy him for fear that he might win. The proximate method is the exploitation of deep-seated Jewish fear. Literally summoning up the demons of Nazism against Britain's finest anti-fascist."
He added later: "A pig that is the British media and political class that is frightening Jewish schoolgirls in London on a giant Goebbellian lie that Jeremy Corbyn not only hates Jews but that the existential future, the existence of Jewish life in Britain, is threatened by this mild-mannered geography teacher in his woolly jumper."
A talkRadio spokesperson said: "You expect robust opinions from George Galloway, but we accept that on this occasion he crossed the line. As a station we understand the need for dissenting voices with a range of counter-opinions."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel