"WE are fu****" – that's how newspapers of the future could report on Brexit, a listening exercise has found.
Scottish Rural Action, an apolitical not-for-profit group, held digital and face-to-face sessions from Inverness to Castle Douglas and Tiree to Eyemouth.
Participants were asked to produce headlines they might see in a newspaper to "reflect opportunities and concerns about Brexit".
Other suggestions included "21st Century Clearance: Scandal of the Rural Poor", "Brexit Bonus for Bankers" and "Shellfish Shambles".
Amanda Burgauer, chair of Scottish Rural Action, said it had uncovered "widespread anger and frustration" about the process, which compounds concerns about depopulation, underfunding and increased centralisation.
She said: “There is widespread anger and frustration across rural Scotland, but that anger isn’t solely about Brexit. It was clear from workshop discussions that Brexit is compounding long standing concerns about rural equity and fragility.
"Brexit was described as the ‘straw that breaks rural Scotland’s back’, with people pointing to structural fragilities across rural communities. Participants generally believed that an historic over-reliance on EU funding to ‘prop-up’ rural areas makes rural Scotland particularly exposed to future loss of EU support.”
One Angus employer within the soft fruit sector has only 20% of the required 4500 staff on his books, Scottish Rural Action was told. That business "predominantly" employs sessional migrant workers.
Two inshore fish production companies in Fort William and Oban with more than 1400 migrant workers between them said they face "severe turnover" of existing staff "due to Brexit uncertainty".
The report, funded through the Scottish Government's Brexit Stakeholder Fund, found rural economies have been "hollowed out by the retreat of the state after ten years of austerity, centralised public procurement and widening societal inequality".
Adding Brexit to this, it is feared, will make some areas "unviable".
Just 10% of those taking part in online or face-to-face events were pro-Brexit.
Of this group, most either said the change could boost their sector or backed withdrawal due to "being anti-Scottish Government or anti-immigration".
Burgauer said: "This report is about giving voice to a rural point of view that is rooted in Scotland’s people and places, rather than its rural industries.
"There was an expectation of a hollowing out of rural Scotland through loss of EU funding, and there was worry about social cohesion with Brexit intensifying a sense of ongoing powerlessness in rural communities."
At the report's launch in Elgin, Constitutional Relations Secretary Michael Russell said: “Rural communities are deeply worried about the impact of Brexit on their lives. From funding and trade to community life and the workforce, many believe the effects will be nothing short of catastrophic.
“This is sadly yet another example of just how damaging Brexit will be for Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel