VINCE Cable’s announcement that he would quit as leader of the LibDems in May came as the party was left reeling from the fallout of a child abuse scandal dating back 40 years.
Late on Thursday night the party suspended former leader David Steel over his failure to act against Cyril Smith, despite the notorious paedophile MP admitting his guilt back in 1979.
The action was announced by the Scottish LibDems following a meeting of senior figures.
Jo Swinson, the party’s deputy leader, and a frontrunner to replace Cable, called it “absolutely the right decision”.
At the inquiry Steel, a former Holyrood presiding officer, denied he had been “hiding his head in the sand” over the child abuse allegations made against the former Rochdale MP.
Smith stepped down as an MP in 1992 and died in 2010. In April 2014, it was reported that there had been 144 complaints against him. Some of his victims were as young as eight.
Steel, who lobbied for Smith to receive a knighthood in 1988, had previously denied knowing Smith was a child abuser. In an interview with the BBC’s Newsnight last year, he said the allegations were “scurrilous hearsay”.
Under questioning, Steel said he confronted Smith about the allegations of child sexual abuse in 1979 after reading them in Private Eye magazine.
The magazine claimed that a series of young boys in Rochdale children’s homes had claimed that as a punishment for minor misdeeds Smith had stripped them, spanked them and bathed their buttocks and on occasion fondled their genitals.
Steel told the inquiry that when he questioned Smith about the reports, the MP had confessed.
Inquiry counsel Brian Altman QC then asked the peer: “So you understood that he’d actually committed these offences, from what he said to you?”
Steel said he’d “assumed that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel