GROUSE shooting in Scotland could be negatively affecting Scotland’s tourist industry, according to a new report.
Populations of mountain hare may also be at risk as a result of the controversial culls by gaming estates, with “potential cascading effects” on predators.
The report – which was drawn up by the James Hutton Institute and Scotland’s Rural College, and commissioned by the Scottish Government – estimates that 2500 equivalent full-time jobs are supported by grouse moors, but emphasises that existing data on their benefits is inadequate.
The authors say the figures on grouse moors’ socio-economic impact “come from a very narrow base of industry-sponsored studies that have self-reporting biases and do not consider counterfactual scenarios”.
The authors go on to point out that the research base has a lack of “robust” evidence on which to base policy decisions.
However, they say the existing evidence highlights that driven grouse moor management and grouse shooting are part of a myriad of wider sporting activities.
The report explains the negative aspects of driven grouse moors – such as raptor persecution, the impact of heather burning on soils and certain birds, and perceived negative landscape – which may be affecting the areas they are based in.
The authors continue: “Negative impacts (perceived or actual) may limit visitor spending within an area from the estimated half million domestic visits, 2.7m accommodation nights and £187m spend on visits that included watching wildlife/bird watching in 2015.”
In examining the impact of muirburn and legal culls, the report identifies “major knowledge gaps” and calls for further research and data collection on both the environmental impacts and the socio-economic impacts of grouse shooting.
With regard to mountain hares the reports states: “Evidence suggests that hare populations in Scotland show limited dispersal capacity and may therefore be prone to local extinction, though hare spatial ecology is not well understood. Changes in mountain hare numbers could have potential cascading effects on predators, although the effects are not well researched.”
Responding to the report, Alex Hogg, chair of the Scottish Gamekeepers’ Association, agreed there were “clearly some knowledge gaps” but welcomed the work done so far.
“The jobs created by grouse shooting, like gamekeepers’ roles, are important because they keep people in some of the most fragile and remote parts of Scotland where opportunities can be very hard to come by,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel