THE Spanish Government’s former representative in Catalonia has told the 11th day of the trial of Catalan independence leaders that before the 2017 referendum there was a “climate of conflict” that endangered the “maintenance of the constitutional order”.
Enric Millo claimed at the Supreme Court in Madrid there were “violent and organised” actions before the poll, with judges and police officers the target of threats and persecution.
He added that there were peaceful demonstrations, but others with what he called “an obvious violent component”.
“There were groups that demonstrated peacefully and other groups that acted with clear violence, because throwing incendiary objects, this is not peaceful, it is violent ... some type of threats painted on the walls, against people, against me,” said Millo.
“There were peaceful demonstrations and there were others in which there was a clear violent component of aggression, harassment, launching of objects, attacks on people ... that, for me, as I understand it, shows they have an obvious violent component.”
Millo said protests organised by the local Committees for the Defence of the Republic (CDRs) were not spontaneous.
“We have been able to verify that these committees are formed by people who have other goals and that they have no problem in using violence when it comes to developing their activities. And they are camouflaged.”
Catalan President Quim Torra was dismissive of Millo’s evidence, tweeting: “There are lies, there are falsehoods and then there are these statements of Mr Millo.”
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel