EUROPEAN Council president Donald Tusk has claimed “external anti-European forces” meddled in the UK’s Brexit vote.
The politician, who previously served as Poland’s Prime Minister, and who has long been a fierce critic of Russian president, Vladimir Putin, warned that those same forces could interfere in May’s European Parliament elections.
READ MORE: A false premise of English greatness is what maintains the great Brexit lie
Tusk told reporters in Austria: “There are external anti-European forces, which are seeking – openly or secretly – to influence the democratic choices of Europeans, as was the case with Brexit and a number of election campaigns across Europe. And it may again be the case with the European elections in May,”
He urged voters to be vigilant for signs of interference. “Do not allow political parties that are funded by external forces, hostile to Europe, to decide on key priorities for the EU, and the new leadership of European institutions,” he said.
Earlier this year, after an 18 month long investigation, the UK Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport committee, called on the British Government to establish an independent investigation into “foreign influence, disinformation, funding, voter manipulation and the sharing of data” in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, the 2016 EU referendum and the 2017 general election.
Committee chair Damian Collins warned: “Democracy is at risk from the malicious and relentless targeting of citizens with disinformation and personalised ‘dark adverts’ from unidentifiable sources, delivered through the major social media platforms we use every day.
“Much of this is directed from agencies working in foreign countries, including Russia.”
READ MORE: Brexit has lit the touch paper of right-wing extremism
Tusk’s comments were in response to an article by Emmanuel Macron, the French President, calling for a “renaissance” of the European Union.
In the 1600 word missive, translated into 24 languages and printed in newspapers across the EU, Macron urged voters to shy away from far-right candidates standing in the European parliament.
“Never since the Second World War has Europe been so essential. Yet never has Europe been in such danger,” he wrote.
“Brexit stands as the symbol of that. It symbolises the crisis of a Europe that has failed to respond to its peoples’ need for protection from the major shocks of the modern world. It also symbolises the European trap.
“The trap lies not in being part of the European Union; the trap is in the lie and the irresponsibility that can destroy it. Who told the British people the truth about their post-Brexit future?
“Who spoke to them about losing access to the EU market? Who mentioned the risks to peace in Ireland of restoring the border? Retreating into nationalism offers nothing; it is rejection without an alternative. And this is the trap that threatens the whole of Europe: the anger mongers, backed by fake news, promise anything and everything.”
The row came as British Brexit secretary, Stephen Barclay, and the attorney general, Geoffrey Cox, met with Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator last night, as talks stumbled on.
Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt insisted progress was being made.
He told the BBC’s Today programme: “The signals we are getting are reasonably positive. I don’t want to overstate them because I still think there’s a lot of work to do but I think they do understand that we are being sincere.”
Meanwhile, BMW could move “some or all” of its Mini production to Holland if there’s a no deal Brexit.
A spokesman for the firm said: “We need frictionless trade”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel